On Friday, April 13, 2018 at 3:19:11 PM UTC-7, cathy.z...@oracle.com wrote:
>
> From: Cathy Zhou <cathy.z...@oracle.com> 
>
> iscsi boot performance can be improved by sleep() with finer 
> grained interval and exponential backoff. 
>
> Signed-off-by: Cathy Zhou <cathy.z...@oracle.com> 
> --- 
>  usr/iscsistart.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++++----------- 
>  1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) 
>
> diff --git a/usr/iscsistart.c b/usr/iscsistart.c 
> index 67ac475..1e77e40 100644 
> --- a/usr/iscsistart.c 
> +++ b/usr/iscsistart.c 
> @@ -27,6 +27,7 @@ 
>  #include <unistd.h> 
>  #include <string.h> 
>  #include <signal.h> 
> +#include <time.h> 
>  #include <sys/mman.h> 
>  #include <sys/utsname.h> 
>  #include <sys/signal.h> 
> @@ -224,7 +225,8 @@ static int login_session(struct node_rec *rec) 
>  { 
>          iscsiadm_req_t req; 
>          iscsiadm_rsp_t rsp; 
> -        int rc, retries = 0; 
> +        int rc, msec, err; 
> +        struct timespec ts; 
>   
>          rc = apply_params(rec); 
>          if (rc) 
> @@ -237,18 +239,29 @@ static int login_session(struct node_rec *rec) 
>          req.command = MGMT_IPC_SESSION_LOGIN; 
>          memcpy(&req.u.session.rec, rec, sizeof(*rec)); 
>   
> -retry: 
> -        rc = iscsid_exec_req(&req, &rsp, 0, ISCSID_REQ_TIMEOUT); 
>          /* 
> -         * handle race where iscsid proc is starting up while we are 
> -         * trying to connect. 
> +         * Need to handle race where iscsid proc is starting up while we 
> are 
> +         * trying to connect. Retry with exponential backoff, start from 
> 50 ms. 
>           */ 
> -        if (rc == ISCSI_ERR_ISCSID_NOTCONN && retries < 30) { 
> -                retries++; 
> -                sleep(1); 
> -                goto retry; 
> -        } else if (rc) 
> -                iscsi_err_print_msg(rc); 
> +        for (msec = 50; msec <= 15000; msec <<= 1) { 
>

Why are you using 50 -> 15000? Isn't the sequence then going to be:
  -> 50
  -> 100
  -> 200
  -> 400
  -> 800
  -> 1600 (too large)

So why not either go to 800 or to 1600?

+                rc = iscsid_exec_req(&req, &rsp, 0, ISCSID_REQ_TIMEOUT); 
> +                if (rc == 0) { 
> +                        return rc; 
> +                } else if (rc == ISCSI_ERR_ISCSID_NOTCONN) { 
> +                        ts.tv_sec = msec / 1000; 
> +                        ts.tv_nsec = (msec % 1000) * 1000000L; 
> + 
> +                        /* On EINTR, retry nanosleep with remaining time. 
> */ 
> +                        while ((err = nanosleep(&ts, &ts)) < 0 && 
> +                               errno == EINTR); 
>

I'd feel better about this if you used one more level of parenthesis.

Also, why are you supplying two timespec values? You don't care about
the remainder, so pass in a NULL as the second argument? 

> +                        if (err < 0) 
> +                                break; 
> +                } else { 
> +                        break; 
> +                } 
> +        } 
> + 
> +        iscsi_err_print_msg(rc); 
>          return rc; 
>  } 
>   
>

Also, what kind of time improvement did you see with this? 

> -- 
> 2.17.0 
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"open-iscsi" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to open-iscsi+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to open-iscsi@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/open-iscsi.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to