Hi, > On 11/12/19 5:37 PM, Martin K. Petersen wrote: > > > >> In iscsi_if_rx func, after receiving one request through > >> iscsi_if_recv_msg func, iscsi_if_send_reply will be called to try to > >> reply the request in do-loop. If the return of iscsi_if_send_reply > >> func return -EAGAIN all the time, one deadloop will occur. > >> > >> For example, a client only send msg without calling recvmsg func, > >> then it will result in the watchdog soft lockup. > >> The details are given as follows, > > > > Lee/Chris/Ulrich: Please review! > > > > > Okay, after looking again at the thread, I do have some additional feedback > for > the patch submitter. > > You should put your "changes in V2, V3, ..." above the patch line (the > "-- " on a line by itself), not as part of the patch. > > Also, as long as you are making one last round of changes, please change > "deadloop" to "deadlock" in your patch subject, as deadloop is not a word. >
Okay, I will correct it in V4. > Lastly, the "Suggested-by" lines you added are fine, but that generally means > that person suggested the patch, not changes. For folks that suggest changes, > it's up to them to say they like or do not like your changes after you make > them, > at which point they can add their "Reviewed-by" tag if they wish. > > Please feel free to send your patch to me directly, before publishing, if you > would like a review before publishing again. Okay, Thanks. > > -- > Lee -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "open-iscsi" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/open-iscsi/EDBAAA0BBBA2AC4E9C8B6B81DEEE1D6915E28CFE%40dggeml505-mbs.china.huawei.com.
