On 2022/3/9 1:19, Mike Christie wrote:
On 3/8/22 9:09 PM, Wenchao Hao wrote:
iscsi_alloc_conn(): alloc and initialize iscsi_cls_conn
iscsi_add_conn(): expose iscsi_cls_conn to userspace's via sysfs.
iscsi_remove_conn(): remove iscsi_cls_conn from sysfs
iscsi_free_conn(): free iscsi_cls_conn

Signed-off-by: Wenchao Hao <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Wu Bo <[email protected]>
---
  drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_iscsi.c | 107 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
  include/scsi/scsi_transport_iscsi.h |   5 ++
  2 files changed, 112 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_iscsi.c 
b/drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_iscsi.c
index 554b6f784223..8e97c6f88359 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_iscsi.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_iscsi.c
@@ -2340,6 +2340,113 @@ void iscsi_free_session(struct iscsi_cls_session 
*session)
  }
  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(iscsi_free_session);
+/**
+ * iscsi_alloc_conn - alloc iscsi class connection
+ * @session: iscsi cls session
+ * @dd_size: private driver data size
+ * @cid: connection id
+ *
+ * This can be called from a LLD or iscsi_transport. The connection
+ * is child of the session so cid must be unique for all connections
+ * on the session.
+ *
+ * Since we do not support MCS, cid will normally be zero. In some cases
+ * for software iscsi we could be trying to preallocate a connection struct
+ * in which case there could be two connection structs and cid would be
+ * non-zero.

Is that with the upstream iscsi tools or your version? I don't think the comment
is needed or is needed somewhere else.

If this happens then they will have the same sysfs/device name so when we do the
device_add it will spit an error about duplicate names.


+ */
+struct iscsi_cls_conn *
+iscsi_alloc_conn(struct iscsi_cls_session *session, int dd_size, uint32_t cid)
+{
+       struct iscsi_transport *transport = session->transport;
+       struct iscsi_cls_conn *conn;
+
+       conn = kzalloc(sizeof(*conn) + dd_size, GFP_KERNEL);
+       if (!conn)
+               return NULL;
+       if (dd_size)
+               conn->dd_data = &conn[1];
+
+       mutex_init(&conn->ep_mutex);
+       INIT_LIST_HEAD(&conn->conn_list);
+       INIT_WORK(&conn->cleanup_work, iscsi_cleanup_conn_work_fn);
+       conn->transport = transport;
+       conn->cid = cid;
+       conn->state = ISCSI_CONN_DOWN;
+
+       /* this is released in the dev's release function */
+       if (!get_device(&session->dev))
+               goto free_conn;
+
+       dev_set_name(&conn->dev, "connection%d:%u", session->sid, cid);
+       device_initialize(&conn->dev);
+       conn->dev.parent = &session->dev;
+       conn->dev.release = iscsi_conn_release;
+
+       return conn;
+
+free_conn:
+       kfree(conn);
+       return NULL;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(iscsi_alloc_conn);
+
+/**
+ * iscsi_add_conn - add iscsi class connection
+ * @conn: iscsi cls connection
+ *
+ * this would expose iscsi_cls_conn to sysfs, so make sure the related
+ * resources when access sysfs attributes are initialized before calling this.
+ */
+int iscsi_add_conn(struct iscsi_cls_conn *conn)
+{
+       int err;
+       unsigned long flags;
+       struct iscsi_cls_session *session = 
iscsi_dev_to_session(conn->dev.parent);
+
+       err = device_add(&conn->dev);
+       if (err) {
+               iscsi_cls_session_printk(KERN_ERR, session,
+                                        "could not register connection's 
dev\n");
+               put_device(&session->dev);

I would call iscsi_free_conn. instead of put_device.


Sorry I noticed it but forget to remove it. Here should not call put_device() or iscsi_free_conn(). If iscsi_add_conn() failed, we shoule not call any put operation which might cause resource free.

+               return err;
+       }
+       err = transport_register_device(&conn->dev);
+       if (err) {
+               iscsi_cls_session_printk(KERN_ERR, session,
+                                        "could not register transport's 
dev\n");
+               device_del(&conn->dev);
+               put_device(&session->dev);


Is for the get_device(&session->dev) in iscsi_alloc_conn? If so you don't need 
to
do it because when the last put is done on the conn->dev, it will call
iscsi_conn_release which does the put on the session when it does 
"put_device(parent).

Or did you mean to call put_device on the conn->dev?


As above, we shouldn't call put_device() here.

I would do device_el(&conn->dev) then do a goto free_conn at the bottom which
does iscsi_free_conn. The place above should do the goto as well.



--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"open-iscsi" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/open-iscsi/d7a0405f-f0df-1db0-e95e-562db1ef064f%40huawei.com.

Reply via email to