As other's have mentioned, a separate list is kind of the only way to
keep confidentiality.
Geronimo as a geronimo-tck list, and a geronimo-tck svn for the
related tck files and harness code. We also have a private GERONIMO-
TCK Jira to track compliance issues. Though we did get by for quite
a while without the Jira.
As far is automating the testing. I built a small cluster of
computers (10 so far) and wrote a Mash (to coin a Web 2.0 term) from
Continuum and ActiveMQ. I.e. we have a distributed test environment
that uses Continuum's build running functionality and ActiveMQ to
distribute that. Every active branch of Geronimo is certified every
hour of every day.
The infrastructure code for that is all in Geronimo svn in the GBuild
subproject, but it seems more and more projects are getting TCKs
these days and I'd be fine seeing this become more of an "Apache"
thing than a "Geronimo" thing *assuming* others would help of course.
-David
On Jul 31, 2006, at 1:31 PM, Patrick Linskey wrote:
BEA will certainly have such a beast up and running once we've
gotten to
that point in our testing cycle. Our current plans aren't to use
gump or
continuum, but I doubt that that bit really matters that much.
However, I don't think that we're allowed to say anything more than
"yes, the JPA TCK passes" or "no, the JPA TCK fails". Is this the
typical amount of info regarding TCKs at Apache, or is there some
procedure by which we can expose more details to committers on
OpenJPA?
Is there some non-public area of Apache repository space for
storing the
tests + test infrastructure?
At the very least, I would assume that we could put our TCK => JUnit
test adapter into OpenJPA, such that others could more easily run the
TCK.
-Patrick
--
Patrick Linskey
BEA Systems, Inc.
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 31, 2006 1:19 PM
To: open-jpa-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: State of OpenJPA code drop
Good question. It would be very nice if someone with access
to the JPA TCK could set up an automated build/test/publish
run on gump or continuum. Hopefully that would reduce the
number of folks who have to sign their first-born away for
the privilege of seeing the TCK code.
Volunteers?
Craig
On Jul 31, 2006, at 1:13 PM, Patrick Linskey wrote:
How does Apache usually do TCK-running, btw?
-Patrick
--
Patrick Linskey
BEA Systems, Inc.
-----Original Message-----
From: David Blevins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 31, 2006 1:03 PM
To: open-jpa-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: State of OpenJPA code drop
On Jul 28, 2006, at 1:14 PM, Patrick Linskey wrote:
Regarding CTS: we haven't yet set up anything that tests
just OpenJPA
against the JPA TCK.
Willing to help with this. Does Apache have the TCK yet?
-David
_____________________________________________________________________
_
_
Notice: This email message, together with any attachments, may
contain
information of BEA Systems, Inc., its subsidiaries and
affiliated
entities, that may be confidential, proprietary, copyrighted
and/or
legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the
individual or entity named in this message. If you are not the
intended recipient, and have received this message in error, please
immediately return this by email and then delete it.
Craig Russell
Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/
jdo
408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
______________________________________________________________________
_
Notice: This email message, together with any attachments, may
contain
information of BEA Systems, Inc., its subsidiaries and
affiliated
entities, that may be confidential, proprietary, copyrighted
and/or
legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the
individual
or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended
recipient,
and have received this message in error, please immediately return
this
by email and then delete it.
