Yep....
An oversight by me. Thanks for pointing it out. I'll get the comments
(along with the follow up comments) in JIRA...
Craig L Russell wrote:
Hi Bryan,
As a matter of team communication, I'd like to see all comments
related to JIRA issues attached to the JIRAs themselves. That way we
don't need to scour the archives to find JIRA-related comments.
Until a discussion results in a JIRA, email threads make sense.
Does this seem like a good idea?
Thanks,
Craig
On Aug 23, 2006, at 4:20 PM, Bryan Noll wrote:
So... I saw that David created the following two JIRA's, so I wanted
to follow up on the thread.
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-29
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-30
Regarding OPENJPA-29:
openjpa-0.9.0-full.jar // contains all openjpa code, openjpa-*.jars
merged
openjpa-0.9.0-nodep.jar // contains all openjpa code and all third
party dependency jars
Do you have your descriptions backwards or am I misunderstanding what
you're saying? Seems like 'nodep' would mean "no dependencies for
this project are bundled into this jar" to me.
IIUC (which I'm not sure that I do, so please correct me) then...
openjpa-0.9.0-nodep.jar would extract to:
- org/apache/openjpa/*/**.class
- META-INF/* ............ (we still need to resolve the 'merge
multiple files of the same name and locations (eg..
ProductDerivations) problem for this)
openjpa-0.9.0-full.jar would extract to:
- org/apache/openjpa/*/**.class
- thirdPartyJars.jar (many of these)
- META-INF/* .......... (same issue as above)
Like I said, not sure this is actually correct. Would the
openjpa-*.jar files be there instead of the unpacked classes? Can
someone with a bit more classloading acuity speak to that? Should
the names actually be openjpa-nodep-0.9.0-SNAPSHOT.jar and
openjpa-full-0.9.0-SNAPSHOT.jar?
-----
Regarding OPENJPA-30:
- I saw that Marc got the newly named SNAPSHOT jars up to a repo....
good stuff.
- The next step would have one jar somewhere like
http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-snapshot-repository/org/apache/openjpa/openjpa/0.9.0-SNAPSHOT/
for people to depend on, instead of many, correct?
- David... if you catch this... I would be glad to help
(translation... observe and learn) you get the thing publishing
nightly from the apache continuum server you spoke of.
Thanks...
Bryan
David Blevins wrote:
On Aug 15, 2006, at 7:42 AM, Craig L Russell wrote:
On Aug 15, 2006, at 6:38 AM, Patrick Linskey wrote:
Check out the Assembly plugin and it's predefined
"jar-with-dependencies" descriptor[1]. I'm pretty sure that
most people
using Maven will just have a runtime dependency on the core OpenJPA
library and be done with it, but it's always nice for Ant users.
Exactly -- mvn users will use the dependencies, but people who
want to
download and use the distribution directly may not want a billion
little
jars.
Yes, my experience says it's ok to have 10 dependencies on e.g.
commons-logger, antlr, etc. but having 10 dependencies on
openjpa-kernel4, openjpa-kernel5, openjpa-api, openjpa-blah is
annoying.
So if possible, I'd also like to have a jar with all the stuff in it.
That'd be nice. Some jar that contains all the openjpa-*.jar files
is perfect for my needs. The good news is that the
maven-assembly-plugin allows you to define several assembly xml
files and build multiple archives containing whatever you like. So
if people want, we could have:
openjpa-0.9.0-full.jar // contains all openjpa code,
openjpa-*.jars merged
openjpa-0.9.0-nodep.jar // contains all openjpa code and all third
party dependency jars
There's a naming convention for this kind of thing, hope I've got it
right.
-David
Craig
-Patrick
_______________________________________________________________________
Notice: This email message, together with any attachments, may
contain
information of BEA Systems, Inc., its subsidiaries and
affiliated
entities, that may be confidential, proprietary, copyrighted
and/or
legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the
individual
or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended
recipient,
and have received this message in error, please immediately return
this
by email and then delete it.
Craig Russell
Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo
408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
Craig Russell
Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo
408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
