Thanks, Patrick. I hadn't even realized that we had that specified in the pom.xml. Learn something new everyday with this project... :-)
Kevin On 11/10/06, Patrick Linskey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I just removed the openjpa-kernel-4 module (moved its contents to openjpa-kernel) and change the poms to use JDK1.4 as the source and target instead of 1.3. -Patrick -- Patrick Linskey BEA Systems, Inc. _______________________________________________________________________ Notice: This email message, together with any attachments, may contain information of BEA Systems, Inc., its subsidiaries and affiliated entities, that may be confidential, proprietary, copyrighted and/or legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended recipient, and have received this message in error, please immediately return this by email and then delete it. > -----Original Message----- > From: Kevin Sutter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, November 10, 2006 7:28 AM > To: open-jpa-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: [RESULT][VOTE] Is JDK 1.3 support required? > > Although we have started to process as if JDK 1.3 is no > longer supported, I > recently realized that I never published the results of the vote... > > +1 4 votes (including my and Patrick's implicit votes) > +/- 0 1 vote > -1 0 votes > > Thus, OpenJPA will only focus on support of JDK 1.4 and > beyond. Thanks. > > Kevin > > On 10/25/06, Kevin Sutter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > A recent discussion concerning a patch for OPENJPA-63 > (http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-63 > > > > > <http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-63?page=comments > #action_12444414>) > > has prompted a question that Patrick and I felt should be > brought out into a > > public discussion. It turns out that the patch posted for > this report is > > using a method on DelegatingDatabaseMetaData that was > introduced in JDK > > 1.4. Patrick's original concern is that we should continue > to support JDK > > 1.3. Since JDK 1.3 has started it's EOL campaign, I'm wondering how > > important it is to continue to support JDK 1.3. My thought (and now > > Patrick's) is that we should focus on JDK 1.4 and above. > Here's your > > chance to vote... > > > > Statement: OpenJPA should support JDK 1.4 and beyond. There is no > > requirement to support the older JDK 1.3 environment. > > > > +1 Agree. JDK 1.4 and beyond > > -1 Disagree. We need to support JDK 1.3. > > +/- 0 Neutral. Do whatever. > > > > Thanks, > > Kevin > > >
