Hi Marc,

I missed Patrick's message. Maybe it's stuck in spam limbo.

On Nov 12, 2006, at 1:32 PM, Marc Prud'hommeaux wrote:


On Nov 12, 2006, at 1:26 PM, Patrick Linskey wrote:

I think that the issue is that the thing that is voted on is the tag.

Is that actually right? My understanding was that the thing that is voted on is the artifacts (in this case, the binary and source zip archives), and that the VCS is not a fundamental part of the release voting process.

The thing that is voted on is the signed artifacts that by definition are not in svn. The tag is just the way you can reproduce the release bits without too much effort.


Additional work might be happening as the vote proceeds; that additional
work may or may not be ready for prime-time.

Right.

I expect that over time, we'll be branching earlier anyways and doing
destabilizing work on a branch separate from the release candidate
branch.

It's difficult to know in advance what the community will require to take a release branch and clean it up enough to release. People find bugs; they want to add one more easy but worthwhile feature; regressions are discovered during testing of other components...

True, but my question is whether we should make branches for the sole purpose of cutting a release or not, which is why I was wondering if actually saves effort or not.

If we are willing to freeze the trunk while cutting a release, then there is no need for a release branch. That includes changing the poms from SNAPSHOT to normal. And this means no nightly builds while releasing, which for me is a deal breaker.

Craig


-Patrick

--
Patrick Linskey
BEA Systems, Inc.

_____________________________________________________________________ __ Notice: This email message, together with any attachments, may contain information of BEA Systems, Inc., its subsidiaries and affiliated entities, that may be confidential, proprietary, copyrighted and/or legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended recipient, and have received this message in error, please immediately return this
by email and then delete it.

-----Original Message-----
From: Marc Prud'hommeaux [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Marc Prud'hommeaux
Sent: Sunday, November 12, 2006 12:53 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Making a release

Craig-

The only difference is that we initially branch from the trunk and
perform the updates to the pom.xml files there, and then release
against the branch, correct?

I don't necessarily object to releasing off of a branch, but does it
really save any effort? After all, if release candidate problems
exist (as they have the last couple times I tried to create a
release), then so therefore commit changes to the branch,
we'll still
need to perform the additional step of merging the changes in the
branch back into the trunk, right?



On Nov 12, 2006, at 10:40 AM, Craig L Russell wrote:

I'd like to propose something like this (edited the wiki page)

The main difference is that upon starting the release process, we
create a branch in which to resolve the release issues while
maintaining the trunk for further development.

h2. Tasks that need to be performed for each release

{info}In the examples below, it is assumed that the current
committed version of OpenJPA is *0.9.6-incubating-SNAPSHOT*, and
the version of the official release will be *0.9.6-incubating* {info}

# Make sure the [#One time setup] steps have been performed
# Create a branch from the trunk (or from a previous branch if
maintaining a branch)
{code:none}
svn copy -m "Create branch for OpenJPA Release 0.9.6-incubating"
  https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openjpa/trunk

https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openjpa/releases/0.9.6-
incubating
{code}
# Change to the trunk for the next steps
# Update the pom.xml files to the subsequent version with the -
SNAPSHOT suffix:
{code:none}
perl -pi -e "s;<version>0.9.6-incubating</version>;<version>0.9.7-
incubating-SNAPSHOT</version>;g" pom.xml */pom.xml
{code}
# Commit the POM changes in the trunk
{code:none}
svn commit -m "Updated to version 0.9.7-incubating-SNAPSHOT"
{code}
# Change to the branch for the new release for the following steps
# Update the POMs to remove "-SNAPSHOT" from the version. If you
have perl installed, you can easily do it with a single command:
{code:none}
perl -pi -e 's;<version>0.9.6-incubating-SNAPSHOT</
version>;<version>0.9.6-incubating</version>;g' pom.xml */pom.xml
{code}
# Commit the POM changes
{code:none}
svn commit -m "Updated to version 0.9.6-incubating"
{code}
# Perform the build with documentation and install it in the local
repository (this step is required because there is a bug in
Maven's
javadoc generation aggregated between multiple modules):
{code:none}
mvn clean install -Pdocbook-profile,sign-release
{code}
{note}This operation will also sign the release artifacts with the
*gpg* utility using the <username>@apache.org key. If your code
signing key is under a different address, specify it by appending
the following argument to the command above: -
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
# Verify the signatures:
{code:none}
gpg --multifile --verify openjpa-project/target/assembly/*.asc
{code}
# Build the javadocs and perform the deploy upload:
{code:none}
mvn verify deploy -Pjavadoc-profile,sign-release
{code}
# Start a vote for the release on the [mailto:open-jpa-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list. For an example of
the mail,
see [this  archived vote|http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/
incubator-open-jpa-dev/200611.mbox/%3c07C7A237-DE80-4BC5-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
# If the vote is successful after 3 days, mail
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] starting a vote for
authorization to release
# Once that vote is successful, update the
[http://cwiki.apache.org/
openjpa/downloads.html] page with information about the download
# Tag the view with the release number:
{code:none}
svn copy -m "OpenJPA Release 0.9.6-incubating"

https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openjpa/releases/0.9.6-
incubating
  https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openjpa/tags/0.9.6-
incubating
{code}
# The branch can now be used to apply patches for future releases
using the branch as a basis (e.g. to create 0.9.6.1-incubating).

Craig Russell
Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System
http://java.sun.com/products/jdo
408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!





Craig Russell
Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo
408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Reply via email to