Hi David,

Thanks again for listening to our request for 1.3 jars.

Craig

On Dec 28, 2006, at 1:38 PM, David Blevins wrote:


On Dec 21, 2006, at 12:19 AM, David Blevins wrote:


On Oct 27, 2006, at 8:38 PM, Craig L Russell wrote:

When can Geronimo ship an upgrade to JTA 1.1 that we can use and compile with 1.3?

These are "goodness" that I think OpenJPA can use.


Ok, so it's taken me a while to get this done, but I've got our JTA 1.1 and JPA specs ready for release and up for vote.

The JPA spec jar had some compliance issues which I fixed:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/geronimo-scm/200612.mbox/% [EMAIL PROTECTED]

The JTA spec jar was fine.

Assuming those votes pass, I'll publish them both and the JTA jar with jdk 1.3 as requested -- ensuring the "goodness" is locked in :)


FYI, the specs are final and available should you want them.

http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo- jta_1.1_spec/1.0/ http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo- jpa_3.0_spec/1.0/

And the jta jar was compiled with jdk 1.3.

-David




Craig Russell
Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo
408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Reply via email to