+1 (belated).

On 2/4/07, Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

+1

Craig

On Feb 3, 2007, at 12:39 AM, Marc Prud'hommeaux wrote:

>
> In the interest of keeping up with the latest-and-greatest, I
> propose we upgrade our project dependency on the stand-alone Derby
> database & JDBC driver for our testing and distribution zip from
> Derby 10.2.1.6 to the latest public version 10.2.2.0. This won't
> affect any core code or behavior at all, it will only affect the
> testing and the Derby database jar we provide with the distribution.
>
> A vote of +1 approves the upgrade, a vote of -1 indicates that you
> don't think we should upgrade.
>

Craig Russell
Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo
408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!


--
-Michael Dick

Reply via email to