[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-125?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12474846
 ] 

Evan Ireland commented on OPENJPA-125:
--------------------------------------

I would recommend an XML schema that permits properties (e.g. sets of 
name/value pairs)
to be specified at the level of entity classes, persistent fields, and named 
queries, e.g.

<entity class="com.example.MyEntity">
  <property name="sybase.SpecialEntityProperty" value="..."/>
  <field name="myPersistentField">
    <property name="sybase.SpecialFieldProperty" value="..."/>
  </field>
  <query name="myNamedQuery">
    <property name="sybase.SpecialQueryProperty" value="..."/>
  </query>
</entity>

I would suggest keeping the schema this simple. We have found that properties 
at these
three levels to be more than adequate for vendor-specific customization of O/R 
mapping.


> OpenJPA-specific metadata cannot be specified in XML descriptors
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: OPENJPA-125
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-125
>             Project: OpenJPA
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: jpa
>            Reporter: Patrick Linskey
>            Priority: Critical
>
> OpenJPA includes a number of annotations that extend the behavior of the JPA 
> specification. Currently, these annotations cannot be specified in an XML 
> descriptor. We must create an XSD that allows XML-based configuration of 
> these settings.
> Additionally, to address OPENJPA-87, we should come up with a good story for 
> when only spec-level XML is used and OpenJPA annotations are also used. 
> Currently, as reported in OPENJPA-87, such a configuration causes us to 
> ignore the OpenJPA annotations.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to