I've got it coded up and am running sanity tests. I'll post the new patch as soon as I verify I didn't break anything obvious.

Craig

On Feb 27, 2007, at 1:11 PM, John Stecher (JIRA) wrote:


[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-160? page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment- tabpanel#action_12476390 ]

John Stecher commented on OPENJPA-160:
--------------------------------------

Craig - I will try to get it coded up this afternoon. Got side tracked on other issues here. :( If you can provide me the code I would be grateful. If not hopefully we (Me and another IBMer are working on this) can get it coded up later this afternoon.

Abe - The last time I looked at bytecode in depth (it's been a while) the field declarations and method declarations were separate in both where they were located in the class file and when they were executed. I thought static and field identifiers were executed first in alphabetical order and then the init method was called. Then I remember there being a <clinit> and <init> method as well but cant recall what they do off the top of my head.

Reuse BrokerImpl objects
------------------------

                Key: OPENJPA-160
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ OPENJPA-160
            Project: OpenJPA
         Issue Type: Sub-task
           Reporter: Michael Dick
        Assigned To: Patrick Linskey
Attachments: newprofile.jpg, openjpa-160-patch.txt, openjpa-160-patch.txt, openjpa-160-patch.txt, perf2.jpg, perf3.jpg




--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


Craig Russell
Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo
408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Reply via email to