It might be good to verify the resolution messages so you can correct the JIRA Client errors when they occur.

Craig

On Mar 9, 2007, at 3:11 AM, Patrick Linskey wrote:

No, I didn't. Must have been a glitch in how JIRA Client merged the
changes to the issue made while I was offline.

-Patrick

--
Patrick Linskey
BEA Systems, Inc.

______________________________________________________________________ _ Notice: This email message, together with any attachments, may contain information of BEA Systems, Inc., its subsidiaries and affiliated entities, that may be confidential, proprietary, copyrighted and/or legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended recipient, and have received this message in error, please immediately return this
by email and then delete it.

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2007 6:27 PM
To: open-jpa-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [jira] Resolved: (OPENJPA-71) Caching primitive
array types consumes excessive memory

Hi Patrick,

The message below says that when you resolved OPENJPA-71, you
changed
the fix version from 0.9.7 to none. Now there is no fix version.

Was that your intent?

Craig

On Mar 8, 2007, at 1:35 AM, Patrick Linskey (JIRA) wrote:


     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-71?
page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Patrick Linskey resolved OPENJPA-71.
------------------------------------

       Resolution: Fixed
    Fix Version/s:     (was: 0.9.7)

Craig Russell
Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/ jdo
408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!



Craig Russell
Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo
408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Reply via email to