Re: 0.9.7 release

[Craig L Russell]

I hate to bring this up, but it takes more than a day or two to cut a release and have it approved. Take a look at the 0.9.6 release. Granted, we're smarter than that now, but it still takes some time.

Craig

On Mar 27, 2007, at 2:09 PM, Kevin Sutter wrote:

Let's say we built a candidate release right now. You want to give the community a chance to find issues with it or to complain that bug xyz hasn't been fixed or that they found a regression. It might take a few days to get the feedback and then all weekend to come up with a new candidate. Then, you need to ask the Incubator for permission to release, which takes a minimum of 3 days (72 hours). You're now into the middle of next week. If the incubator folks find anything, it's another spin of the wheel.

Patrick,

deadline for the 0.9.7 release?

Kevin

On 3/27/07, Patrick Linskey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

I tend to agree. Just to give us a little bit of time to wrap up a couple of fixes for pending Issues, how about if we set Thursday or Friday as the

0.9.7 issues being moved out to 0.9.8.

-Patrick

--
Patrick Linskey
BEA Systems, Inc.


by email and then delete it.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Marc Prud'hommeaux [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Marc Prud'hommeaux
> Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2007 11:39 AM
> To: open-jpa-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: 0.9.7 release
>
> Matthieu-
>

> together the beginnings of a roadmap summary that should be useful
> for this.
>
> Looking at the JIRA roadmap for OpenJPA (http://issues.apache.org/
> jira/browse/OPENJPA?
> report=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.project:roadmap-panel), we
> have a pretty ambition list of fixes for 0.9.7. If your ODE release

> cut a release sooner rather than later.
>
> Thoughts anyone?
>
>
>
> On Mar 26, 2007, at 11:54 AM, Matthieu Riou wrote:
>
> > Hi guys,
> >

> > using
> > OpenJPA (pretty happily I should say). We can't use 0.9.6
> as we need a
> > couple of fixes from 0.9.7 so we've been using the snapshot
> so far.
> > But as

> > depending on snapshots is not that nice).
> >
> > So we were just wondering if you had any time frame so far for
> > 0.9.7 final.
> > I've seen that you started discussing future plans so maybe 0.9.7
> > should
> > happen soon enough?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Matthieu
>
>


and then delete it.

I don't think that any of the pending 0.9.7 issues are showstoppers; if we want to create a 0.9.7 release ASAP, I'd be content with all of the _____________________________________________________________________ __ Notice: This email message, together with any attachments, may contain information of BEA Systems, Inc., its subsidiaries and affiliated entities, that may be confidential, proprietary, copyrighted and/or legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended recipient, and have received this message in error, please immediately return this > I don't think we have any date estimates yet. Craig was going to put > is being blocked, I wonder if it would make sense to bump everything > up a release (0.9.7 issues go to 0.9.8, and 0.9.8 goes to 0.9.9) and > > We've started preparing an incubator release for ODE and we're now > > you know we won't be able to release with it (and generally speaking Notice: This email message, together with any attachments, may contain information of BEA Systems, Inc., its subsidiaries and affiliated entities, that may be confidential, proprietary, copyrighted and/or legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended recipient, and have received this message in error, please immediately return this by email

Craig Russell
Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo
408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!

smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature