> <2|true|0.9.7-incubating-SNAPSHOT>
org.apache.openjpa.util.StoreException:

You definitely should not be getting that exception -- OpenJPA should
only be throwing exception types that are in the
org.apache.openjpa.persistence package and sub-packages.

Can you print out the actual class of the exception that is thrown
(i.e., System.err.println(e.getClass()) just in case the exception is
just doing a bad job of printing itself out?

Thanks,

-Patrick

-- 
Patrick Linskey
BEA Systems, Inc. 

_______________________________________________________________________
Notice:  This email message, together with any attachments, may contain
information  of  BEA Systems,  Inc.,  its subsidiaries  and  affiliated
entities,  that may be confidential,  proprietary,  copyrighted  and/or
legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the individual
or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended recipient,
and have received this message in error, please immediately return this
by email and then delete it. 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: wanyna [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2007 8:26 PM
> To: open-jpa-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: why not an EntityExistsException was thrown?
> 
> 
> I was confused in result of my test cases.
> My test is about JPA exceptions. I use derby in my tests.
> The first case is simply persist an object, the PK of the 
> object has existed
> in database,
> so exception arose.
>                       entityManager = factory.createEntityManager();
>                       entityManager.getTransaction().begin();
>                       ...
>                       entityManager.persist(anObject);        
>                       entityManager.getTransaction().commit();
> exception is:
> <2|true|0.9.7-incubating-SNAPSHOT> 
> org.apache.openjpa.util.StoreException:
> The transaction has been rolled back.  See the nested 
> exceptions for details
> on the errors that occurred.
>       at
> org.apache.openjpa.kernel.BrokerImpl.newFlushException(BrokerI
> mpl.java:2091)
>       at 
> org.apache.openjpa.kernel.BrokerImpl.flush(BrokerImpl.java:1938)
>       at 
> org.apache.openjpa.kernel.BrokerImpl.flushSafe(BrokerImpl.java:1836)
>       at
> org.apache.openjpa.kernel.BrokerImpl.beforeCompletion(BrokerIm
> pl.java:1754)
>       at
> org.apache.openjpa.kernel.LocalManagedRuntime.commit(LocalMana
> gedRuntime.java:76)
>       at 
> org.apache.openjpa.kernel.BrokerImpl.commit(BrokerImpl.java:1311)
>       at
> org.apache.openjpa.kernel.DelegatingBroker.commit(DelegatingBr
> oker.java:863)
>       at
> org.apache.openjpa.persistence.EntityManagerImpl.commit(Entity
> ManagerImpl.java:406)
>       at test.Main.main(Main.java:82)
> Caused by: <2|false|0.9.7-incubating-SNAPSHOT>
> org.apache.openjpa.util.StoreException: The statement was 
> aborted because it
> would have caused a duplicate key value in a unique or primary key
> constraint or unique index identified by 'SQL070403054930170' 
> defined on
> 'BSC'. {prepstmnt 15774883 INSERT INTO BSC (objid, objname, created,
> msc_name, objclass) VALUES (?, ?, ?, ?, ?) [params=(long) 1, (String)
> objname1, (Timestamp) 2006-05-04 18:13:51.0, (String) 
> objname0, (String)
> bsc]} [code=-1, state=23505]
> FailedObject: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>       at
> org.apache.openjpa.jdbc.sql.DBDictionary.newStoreException(DBD
> ictionary.java:3764)
>       at
> org.apache.openjpa.jdbc.sql.SQLExceptions.getStore(SQLExceptio
> ns.java:94)
>       at
> org.apache.openjpa.jdbc.sql.SQLExceptions.getStore(SQLExceptio
> ns.java:64)
>       at
> org.apache.openjpa.jdbc.kernel.PreparedStatementManagerImpl.fl
> ushInternal(PreparedStatementManagerImpl.java:103)
>       at
> org.apache.openjpa.jdbc.kernel.PreparedStatementManagerImpl.fl
> ush(PreparedStatementManagerImpl.java:68)
>       at
> org.apache.openjpa.jdbc.kernel.OperationOrderUpdateManager.flu
> shPrimaryRow(OperationOrderUpdateManager.java:200)
>       at
> org.apache.openjpa.jdbc.kernel.OperationOrderUpdateManager.flu
> sh(OperationOrderUpdateManager.java:86)
>       at
> org.apache.openjpa.jdbc.kernel.AbstractUpdateManager.flush(Abs
> tractUpdateManager.java:86)
>       at
> org.apache.openjpa.jdbc.kernel.AbstractUpdateManager.flush(Abs
> tractUpdateManager.java:69)
>       at
> org.apache.openjpa.jdbc.kernel.JDBCStoreManager.flush(JDBCStor
> eManager.java:511)
>       at
> org.apache.openjpa.kernel.DelegatingStoreManager.flush(Delegat
> ingStoreManager.java:127)
>       ... 8 more
> Caused by: org.apache.openjpa.lib.jdbc.ReportingSQLException: 
> The statement
> was aborted because it would have caused a duplicate key 
> value in a unique
> or primary key constraint or unique index identified by 
> 'SQL070403054930170'
> defined on 'BSC'. {prepstmnt 15774883 INSERT INTO BSC (objid, objname,
> created, msc_name, objclass) VALUES (?, ?, ?, ?, ?) [params=(long) 1,
> (String) objname1, (Timestamp) 2006-05-04 18:13:51.0, 
> (String) objname0,
> (String) bsc]} [code=-1, state=23505]
>       at
> org.apache.openjpa.lib.jdbc.LoggingConnectionDecorator.wrap(Lo
> ggingConnectionDecorator.java:188)
>       at
> org.apache.openjpa.lib.jdbc.LoggingConnectionDecorator.access$
800(LoggingConnectionDecorator.java:53)
>       at
> org.apache.openjpa.lib.jdbc.LoggingConnectionDecorator$Logging
Connection>
$LoggingPreparedStatement.executeUpdate(LoggingConnectionDecor
> ator.java:854)
>       at
> org.apache.openjpa.lib.jdbc.DelegatingPreparedStatement.execut
> eUpdate(DelegatingPreparedStatement.java:266)
>       at
> org.apache.openjpa.jdbc.kernel.JDBCStoreManager$CancelPrepared
Statement.executeUpdate(JDBCStoreManager.java:1360)
>       at
> org.apache.openjpa.jdbc.kernel.PreparedStatementManagerImpl.fl
> ushInternal(PreparedStatementManagerImpl.java:92)
>       ... 15 more
> 
> I wonder why not an EntityExistsException was thrown?
> 
> In the second case, I add a query before persist,  
>                       entityManager = factory.createEntityManager();
>                       /*
>                        * query before persist, even bofore 
> transaction effects samely.
>                        * this query makes exception thrown in 
> persist section difference.
>                        * it seems that query what entity is 
> not important,
>                        * but must get result and result must 
> has some record.
>                        */
>                       entityManager.createQuery(jpql).getResultList();
> 
>                       entityManager.getTransaction().begin();
>                       ...
>                       entityManager.persist(anObject);        
>                       entityManager.getTransaction().commit();
> exception:
> <2|false|0.9.7-incubating-SNAPSHOT>
> org.apache.openjpa.persistence.EntityExistsException: An 
> object of type
> "generate.Bsc" with oid "generate.Bsc-1:objname1" already 
> exists in this
> context; another cannot be persisted.
> FailedObject: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>       at 
> org.apache.openjpa.kernel.BrokerImpl.persist(BrokerImpl.java:2370)
>       at 
> org.apache.openjpa.kernel.BrokerImpl.persist(BrokerImpl.java:2206)
>       at
> org.apache.openjpa.kernel.DelegatingBroker.persist(DelegatingB
> roker.java:991)
>       at
> org.apache.openjpa.persistence.EntityManagerImpl.persist(Entit
> yManagerImpl.java:526)
>       at test.Main.main(Main.java:72)
> FailedObject:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> An EntityExistsException was thrown this time, why? 
> 
> Exception is different, and when exception was thrown is also 
> different.
> first case exception was caught at commit,
> second case, exception was caught at persist, why?
> 
> -- 
> View this message in context: 
> http://www.nabble.com/why-not-an-EntityExistsException-was-thr
own--tf3523673.html#a9830350
> Sent from the open-jpa-dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> 
> 

Notice:  This email message, together with any attachments, may contain 
information  of  BEA Systems,  Inc.,  its subsidiaries  and  affiliated 
entities,  that may be confidential,  proprietary,  copyrighted  and/or legally 
privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity 
named in this message. If you are not the intended recipient, and have received 
this message in error, please immediately return this by email and then delete 
it.

Reply via email to