On 4/12/07, Kevin Sutter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Armad, This exception doesn't mean the table doesn't exist in the database, it means that the metadata doesn't define a proper table for this persistence type. Either the annotations or the xml are not properly defining the table for this persistence type. It would be good to see the complete exception text. Also, the annotated Entity classes and/or the persistence.xml would help with deciphering this problem.
That's almost exactly how I responded to him on the Polish-speaking newsgroup - pl.comp.lang.java. Nice to see I wasn't mistaken. Thanks Kevin! I'd bet that he uses defaults and the class name doesn't correspond to the table name or worse yet, the application doesn't connect to the appropriate schema. Jacek -- Jacek Laskowski http://www.JacekLaskowski.pl
