Eh -- either way. If it's easy or they're cached somewhere, go for it, but if not, go enjoy y our Saturday evening and we'll look at a new release candidate next week.
Eddie On 4/14/07, Michael Dick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Unfortunately I just deleted them - it'll take a few minutes to re-publish. On 4/14/07, Eddie O'Neil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Mike-- > > Thanks; is there any chance that the old artifacts are still around > somewhere? I was going to give them a review this weekend which could > save us a release round trip if any issues crop up. If they're around > somewhere, send along a link. > > Thanks. > Eddie > > > > On 4/14/07, Michael Dick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'm rescinding this vote due to issues with the license header included > in > > the source files. > > > > Thanks Craig for finding the problem. I've removed the artifacts from my > > home directory on people.apache.org - I'll publish a new release > candidate > > early this week. > > > > On 4/13/07, Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Hi Mike, > > > > > > I now understand that your message only mentioned a subset of the > > > artifacts that we're planning on publishing for the release of 0.9.7. > > > > > > On Apr 13, 2007, at 1:54 PM, Michael Dick wrote: > > > > > > > Marc beat me to it, but in case this helps here's the xml that can > > > > be used > > > > to access the staging repository : > > > > > > > > <repositories> > > > > <repository> > > > > <id>staging-repository</id> > > > > <name>mikedd's staging repository</name> > > > > <url> > > > > > > > > http://people.apache.org/~mikedd/staging-repository<http:// > > > > people.apache.org/%7Emikedd/staging-repository> > > > > </url> > > > > </repository> > > > > . . . > > > > </repositories> > > > > > > > > > > > > All the OpenJPA artifacts can be accessed this way (at least I was > > > > able to > > > > download them). If there are other artifacts that we need to > > > > publish then > > > > I'll go ahead and put them on people.apache.org/~mikedd too. Maybe > > > > we just > > > > need to include these instructions in the email that we send out > > > > for the > > > > vote? > > > > > > Yes, I think this would make it clear that we're not releasing just > > > the binary and source zip files but the binary maven jar and pom > > > artifacts as well. It was the message not the staging of the > > > artifacts that threw me off. > > > > > > Thanks! > > > > > > Craig > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > > > > > On 4/13/07, Marc Prud'hommeaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> > > > >> Craig- > > > >> > > > >> > I'm really asking that the 0.9.7 release that we plan to put into > > > >> > the incubating repository needs to be put to a vote at the same > > > >> > time as we release the other artifacts. The pom.xml and the > > > >> openjpa- > > > >> > all.0.9.7-incubating.jar should be part of the vote and available > > > >> > in the staging repository. > > > >> > > > >> I'm not sure I completely understand your issue, but I am guessing > > > >> you are either asking whether other maven-friendly jar artifacts > were > > > >> created for the release, or else whether those jar artifacts need > to > > > >> be listed and voted on. > > > >> > > > >> In the previous release, we just voted on the final binary (http:// > > > >> people.apache.org/~mikedd/staging-repository/org/apache/openjpa/ > > > >> openjpa-project/0.9.7-incubating/openjpa-project-0.9.7-incubating- > > > >> binary.zip). The deploy process does also deploy the other module > > > >> jars (e.g., see > http://people.apache.org/~mikedd/staging-repository/ > > > >> org/apache/openjpa/openjpa-all/0.9.7-incubating/), so you should be > > > >> able access them in a pom.xml just like any repository. > > > >> > > > >> AFAIK, this is how all the other projects that use Maven have done > it > > > >> (e.g., ActiveMQ). Since the other deployed artifacts are either > > > >> identical to, or derivative from, the binary assembly, it seems to > me > > > >> that listing every uploaded artifact might be needlessly > cumbersome. > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> Please let me know if I have mis-understood your issue. > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> On Apr 13, 2007, at 12:40 PM, Craig L Russell wrote: > > > >> > > > >> > Hi Marc, > > > >> > > > > >> > Artifacts need to be approved (voted on by the PMC) before they > are > > > >> > put into repositories. The 0.9.6 release was put into the > > > >> > incubating repository only after it was approved by the IPMC. > > > >> > > > > >> > I'm really asking that the 0.9.7 release that we plan to put into > > > >> > the incubating repository needs to be put to a vote at the same > > > >> > time as we release the other artifacts. The pom.xml and the > > > >> openjpa- > > > >> > all.0.9.7-incubating.jar should be part of the vote and available > > > >> > in the staging repository. > > > >> > > > > >> > Craig > > > >> > > > > >> > On Apr 13, 2007, at 12:09 PM, Marc Prud'hommeaux wrote: > > > >> > > > > >> >> Craig- > > > >> >> > > > >> >>> I thought we were going to also release a maven download for > the > > > >> >>> jar file containing all the openjpa stuff and a pom that > contains > > > >> >>> the dependencies. This would enable folks using maven to simply > > > >> >>> put the five lines of code naming the dependency into their pom > > > >> >>> and put the incubating repository into their maven repositories > > > >> >>> list and they would be done. > > > >> >> > > > >> >> Note that they can do that already with the existing artifacts, > > > >> >> since Maven downloads transitive dependencies. For example, this > > > >> >> pom.xml works fine for me in that it downloads and uses all of > the > > > >> >> OpenJPA libraries and dependencies: > > > >> >> > > > >> >> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> > > > >> >> <project> > > > >> >> <modelVersion>4.0.0</modelVersion> > > > >> >> <groupId>some-project</groupId> > > > >> >> <artifactId>some-artifact</artifactId> > > > >> >> <packaging>jar</packaging> > > > >> >> <name>My Project</name> > > > >> >> <version>1.0.0</version> > > > >> >> <repositories> > > > >> >> <repository> > > > >> >> <id>apache-snapshots</id> > > > >> >> <url>http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-incubating- > > > >> >> repository</url> > > > >> >> </repository> > > > >> >> </repositories> > > > >> >> <dependencies> > > > >> >> <dependency> > > > >> >> <groupId>org.apache.openjpa</groupId> > > > >> >> <artifactId>openjpa-all</artifactId> > > > >> >> <version>0.9.6-incubating</version> > > > >> >> </dependency> > > > >> >> </dependencies> > > > >> >> </project> > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> >> There might be some other good reasons to make a separate > > > >> >> distribution that bundles all of the jars into a single > uber-jar, > > > >> >> but, as I mentioned before, I personally don't think it is worth > > > >> >> the effort, especially for a project that is so component- > > > >> oriented. > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> >> On Apr 13, 2007, at 11:55 AM, Craig L Russell wrote: > > > >> >> > > > >> >>> Hi Michael, > > > >> >>> > > > >> >>> Thanks for all the work. > > > >> >>> > > > >> >>> I thought we were going to also release a maven download for > the > > > >> >>> jar file containing all the openjpa stuff and a pom that > contains > > > >> >>> the dependencies. This would enable folks using maven to simply > > > >> >>> put the five lines of code naming the dependency into their pom > > > >> >>> and put the incubating repository into their maven repositories > > > >> >>> list and they would be done. > > > >> >>> > > > >> >>> Was I just dreaming this up? > > > >> >>> > > > >> >>> Thanks, > > > >> >>> > > > >> >>> Craig > > > >> >>> > > > >> >>> On Apr 12, 2007, at 3:20 PM, Michael Dick wrote: > > > >> >>> > > > >> >>>> OpenJPA People- > > > >> >>>> > > > >> >>>> In accordance with the Incubating Releases guidelines at > > > >> >>>> http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/ > > > >> >>>> Incubation_Policy.html#Releases , > > > >> >>>> I've taken a shot at making a release and start a vote on > > > >> >>>> publishing a " > > > >> >>>> 0.9.7-incubating" release of OpenJPA. > > > >> >>>> > > > >> >>>> The release candidate is at: > > > >> >>>> > http://people.apache.org/~mikedd/staging-repository/org/apache/ > > > >> >>>> openjpa/openjpa-project/0.9.7-incubating/openjpa-project-0.9.7 > - > > > >> >>>> incubating-binary.zip > > > >> >>>> > > > >> >>>> The GPG signature and MD5 checksums are at: > > > >> >>>> > http://people.apache.org/~mikedd/staging-repository/org/apache/ > > > >> >>>> openjpa/openjpa-project/0.9.7-incubating/openjpa-project-0.9.7 > - > > > >> >>>> incubating-binary.zip.asc > > > >> >>>> > http://people.apache.org/~mikedd/staging-repository/org/apache/ > > > >> >>>> openjpa/openjpa-project/0.9.7-incubating/openjpa-project-0.9.7 > - > > > >> >>>> incubating-binary.zip.md5 > > > >> >>>> > > > >> >>>> The sources, sources GPG signature and sources MD5 checksum > are > > > >> >>>> available > > > >> >>>> at: > > > >> >>>> > http://people.apache.org/~mikedd/staging-repository/org/apache/ > > > >> >>>> openjpa/openjpa-project/0.9.7-incubating/openjpa-project-0.9.7 > - > > > >> >>>> incubating-source.zip > > > >> >>>> > http://people.apache.org/~mikedd/staging-repository/org/apache/ > > > >> >>>> openjpa/openjpa-project/0.9.7-incubating/openjpa-project-0.9.7 > - > > > >> >>>> incubating-source.zip.asc > > > >> >>>> > http://people.apache.org/~mikedd/staging-repository/org/apache/ > > > >> >>>> openjpa/openjpa-project/0.9.7-incubating/openjpa-project-0.9.7 > - > > > >> >>>> incubating-source.zip.md5 > > > >> >>>> > > > >> >>>> I have tagged the sources at: > > > >> >>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openjpa/tags/0.9.7- > > > >> >>>> incubating/ > > > >> >>>> > > > >> >>>> Please vote to publish this incubating release on the project > > > >> >>>> Web page: > > > >> >>>> > > > >> >>>> http://cwiki.apache.org/openjpa/downloads.html > > > >> >>>> > > > >> >>>> This vote will remain open until 5:20 CST on Tuesday April > 17th > > > >> >>>> (three > > > >> >>>> business days). > > > >> >>>> A "+1" indicates that you approve of the release, a "-1" > > > >> >>>> indicates a > > > >> >>>> vote against making a release > > > >> >>>> > > > >> >>>> -- > > > >> >>>> -Michael Dick > > > >> >>> > > > >> >>> Craig Russell > > > >> >>> Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/ > > > >> >>> products/jdo > > > >> >>> 408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > >> >>> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp! > > > >> >>> > > > >> >> > > > >> > > > > >> > Craig Russell > > > >> > Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/ > > > >> products/jdo > > > >> > 408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > >> > P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp! > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > -Michael Dick > > > > > > Craig Russell > > > Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo > > > 408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > -Michael Dick > > > -- -Michael Dick
