On Apr 24, 2007, at 10:39 AM, Patrick Linskey wrote:
Seems to me that something is wrong here. Maybe the code in
PersistenceProviderImpl should be removing the property?
Maybe the ConfigurationProvider should know about the
property? Maybe this is actually not something that should
be settable in persistence.xml?
#2. Thanks for pointing this out.
OK, I opened https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-225 to
make it harder to forget :-)
thanks
david jencks
-Patrick
--
Patrick Linskey
BEA Systems, Inc.
______________________________________________________________________
_
Notice: This email message, together with any attachments, may
contain
information of BEA Systems, Inc., its subsidiaries and
affiliated
entities, that may be confidential, proprietary, copyrighted
and/or
legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the
individual
or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended
recipient,
and have received this message in error, please immediately return
this
by email and then delete it.
-----Original Message-----
From: David Jencks [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2007 10:21 AM
To: open-jpa-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: ClassTransformerOptions in persistence.xml properties?
After a lot of research I found that its possible to get
something like this into the persistence unit info properties
openjpa.ClassTransformerOptions=ScanDevPath=true
(expresses as part of a properties file rather than the
equivalent xml from persistence.xml)
and that results in devScan == true in a bunch of method
calls in class transforming. There's some code in
PersistenceProviderImpl that explicitly looks for this:
String ctOpts = (String) Configurations.getProperty
(CLASS_TRANSFORMER_OPTIONS,
pui.getProperties()); (lines 94-95)
leading me to believe that this might be a reasonable thing
to try to do.
However, I get a lot of messages:
08:43:22,636 WARN [Runtime] The property named
"openjpa.ClassTransformerOptions" was not recognized and will
be ignored, although the name closely matches a valid
property called "openjpa.ClassResolver".
Seems to me that something is wrong here. Maybe the code in
PersistenceProviderImpl should be removing the property?
Maybe the ConfigurationProvider should know about the
property? Maybe this is actually not something that should
be settable in persistence.xml?
thanks
david jencks
Notice: This email message, together with any attachments, may
contain information of BEA Systems, Inc., its subsidiaries
and affiliated entities, that may be confidential, proprietary,
copyrighted and/or legally privileged, and is intended solely for
the use of the individual or entity named in this message. If you
are not the intended recipient, and have received this message in
error, please immediately return this by email and then delete it.
