Out of curiosity, is there an existing problem that this fixes, or
did you just notice through code inspection they we weren't passing
the ClassLoader in places where it appeared we should?
On May 7, 2007, at 2:38 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Date: Mon May 7 14:38:20 2007
New Revision: 536001
Propagate the provided classloader further into the PCEnhancer call