-1 I like the idea of having our first release out of the incubator be 1.0.
Let's drop the trailing .0 and reserve the third digit for patch releases. This brings up the issue of release naming which we've deferred until now. I think we need to decide what we call releases and at what level we support backward compatibility.
I'll just emphasize my earlier comments about going through the open JIRA issues and really making sure that we'll address the major functionality, performance, and usability deficiencies. So this will affect the schedule but not the naming of the release.
Craig On May 23, 2007, at 12:30 PM, Marc Prud'hommeaux wrote:
We recently discussed committing ourselves to the next release being OpenJPA 1.0.0. The general consensus seems to be in favor, so I'm putting it to a vote.+1 Make the current release be 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT, which indicates that the next released version will be 1.0.0-1 Leave the current release to be 0.9.8-SNAPSHOT 0 Don't care This vote will remain open until 12pm PST on 5/26. I'll start the voting off by recording my vote: +1
Craig Russell Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo 408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
