Yeah, I'm afraid I might have stripped out too much in order to get a working minimal set.
Changing the check system solved this issue. Thanks! On Thu, 26 Apr 2018, at 16:08, Alexander Bergmann wrote: > Hi Jan, > > if I'm not mistaken the problem lies inside the check system reference. > You have to point to the oval-definitions-5 and not to oval-common-5. > > <check system="http://oval.mitre.org/XMLSchema/oval-definitions-5";> > <check-content-ref name="oval:com.test:def:1" href="test_oval.xml"/> > </check> > > Furthermore the <select> tags are pointing to non existing references. I > would delete them and add a <select> statement to your RULE-001001. > > > Have fun, > Alex~ > > > On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 01:00:22PM +0200, Jan De Luyck wrote: > > Hey list, > > > > I'm probably looking at this from the wrong way, but I thought that if one > > would include oval statements in the XCCDF rules, you'd be able to use > > "oscap xccdf eval" - but that just returns a bunch of notchecked statements. > > > > Or am I doing something wrong? > > > > $ oscap xccdf eval test_xccdf.xml > > Title Test 12345 > > Rule xccdf_test_rule_RULE-001001 > > Ident RULE-001001 > > Result notchecked > > > > $ oscap oval eval test_oval.xml > > Definition oval:com.test:def:1: true > > Evaluation done. > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Open-scap-list mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/open-scap-list > > > -- > Alexander Bergmann <[email protected]>, Security Engineer, GPG:9FFA4886 > SUSE Linux GmbH, GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton > HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg) > Email had 1 attachment: > + signature.asc > 1k (application/pgp-signature) _______________________________________________ Open-scap-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/open-scap-list
