Some clarifications. I am not a professor, but thx for giving me such honor title :-) I have not reviewed the automake, config diff. I am not qualified to do the review. Can someone review that? Thx! Sun
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 3:25 PM, zhangxingliang <zhangxingli...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, all: > Simplnano plans to merge code to trunk before the end of July. > The diff file has been reviewed by Professor Sun.Chan, and 90% of the > modifications are codes specific to SL target (enclosed by #if > defined(TARG_SL) … #endif), and the remains are some modifications to open64 > new configure-make system(introduced in open64-trunk r3088). > The diff file compares merge codes with open64-trunk r3276. I have > divided the diff file into several parts according to different modules, and > there are 5 parts to be reviewed: > (1) diff_of_be: changes of be; > (2) diff_of_cg: changes of cg; > (3) diff_of_ipa: changes of ipa > (4) diff_of_kgccfe: changes of kgccfe > (5) diff_of_automake: changes of configure.ac related stuff > > Thank you for gate-keeper’s hard work, and please let me know your > feedbacks. > > Best regards. > Zhang Xing Liang > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint > What will you do first with EVO, the first 4G phone? > Visit sprint.com/first -- http://p.sf.net/sfu/sprint-com-first > _______________________________________________ > Open64-devel mailing list > Open64-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/open64-devel > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint What will you do first with EVO, the first 4G phone? Visit sprint.com/first -- http://p.sf.net/sfu/sprint-com-first _______________________________________________ Open64-devel mailing list Open64-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/open64-devel
