Steve Ellcey wrote: > On Tue, 2010-07-20 at 05:35 +0700, "C. Bergström" wrote: > >> Steve Ellcey wrote: >> >>> On Tue, 2010-07-20 at 06:25 +0800, Sun Chan wrote: >>> >>> >>>> sorry. I am ok with the change, much better implementation. May I ask >>>> where the deleted code originated (you can tell me privately) >>>> Sun >>>> >>>> >>> I have no idea. Perhaps someone else on the list knows. >>> >>> >> So if you don't know where it comes from then you don't know the >> copyright holder? How can you be assured the license can be GPLv2+ as >> the Open64 check-in policy requires? >> (Apologies if I'm maybe missing something there) >> > > He asked about the code I deleted, not the code I added (and which I > wrote). I am not sure why the copyright of code that is being removed > would matter. > ack.. that makes perfect sense.. I read too quickly the word originated + deleted (I read it as where did the originated code come from and then your reply)
/me back to being quiet.. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint What will you do first with EVO, the first 4G phone? Visit sprint.com/first -- http://p.sf.net/sfu/sprint-com-first _______________________________________________ Open64-devel mailing list Open64-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/open64-devel
