In libinstr2.patch, there are some changes in SL-specified code, can
guys in SL review that change?

2010/8/11 Gilmore, Doug <doug.gilm...@amd.com>:
> Sorry I should have sent these patches sooner for review.
>
>
>
> Here are two patches to address this issue, along with some
>
> cleanup of the configuration of library builds and the addition of
>
> a convenience install rule that can be used during development.
>
>
>
> libinstr2.patch:
>
> - Fixes the debug build problem of the instrumentation library.
>
>
>
> configure.patch:
>
> - Added configure option:
>
>   --with-build-lib-optimize=DEFAULT|DEBUG
>
>
>
>   Note that --with-build-optimize=DEBUG will now only enable debugging
>
>   in the compiler build.
>
>
>
>   The --help comment for --with-build-lib-optimize, notes
>
>   that --with-build-lib-optimize=DEBUG is not well tested.
>
>
>
>   Note that with this change compiler/library builds configured with
>
>   --with-build-lib-optimize=DEBUG can now be used for performance
>
>   testing.
>
> - Breakup install rule into two rules, one for the GNU
>
>   FEs (slow) and one for the compiler (fast), thus
>
>   rebuilding and installing a component of the compiler
>
>   can done via:
>
>
>
>   make && make -C ../../.. install_compiler
>
>
>
>   instead of:
>
>
>
>   make && make -C ../../.. install
>
>
>
> Doug
>
>
>
> From: Gautam Chakrabarti [mailto:gautam.c...@yahoo.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 11, 2010 8:59 AM
> To: s...@cup.hp.com; Sun Chan
> Cc: Open64-devel
> Subject: Re: [Open64-devel] error when linking libinstr,a
>
>
>
> As Steve mentioned, libinstr2 is C++ code, but it does not use STL. libinstr
> still contains the original code before PathScale's change (as Sun said) and
> uses STL -- probably the old code needs to be removed. libinstr2 is supposed
> to not link with libstdc++, and should be built with -fno-exceptions and
> other flags as Steve already said. The debug build is broken.
>
>
>
> Gautam
>
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: Steve Ellcey <s...@cup.hp.com>
> To: Sun Chan <sun.c...@gmail.com>
> Cc: Open64-devel <Open64-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
> Sent: Wed, August 11, 2010 8:40:16 AM
> Subject: Re: [Open64-devel] error when linking libinstr,a
>
> On Wed, 2010-08-11 at 00:18 -0700, Sun Chan wrote:
>> this make no sense. Pathscale already changed the library to C
>> implementation. I believe the changes have been merged
>> Sun
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 11:38 PM, Jian-Xin Lai <laij...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > The workaround is to link with -lstdc++.
>> >
>> > 2010/8/10 Hucheng Zhou <zhou.huch...@gmail.com>:
>> >> Hi:
>> >>  When I tried to use fbo, there is an error when linking libinstr.a:
>> >>
>> >> /home/zhc/open64-install//lib/gcc-lib/x86_64-open64-linux/4.2/libinstr.a(profile_interface.o):(.gnu.linkonce.d.DW.ref.__gxx_personality_v0+0x0):
>> >> undefined reference to `__gxx_personality_v0'
>> >>  Thanks.
>
> The x86 platform builds libinstr from the sources in
> osprey/instrumentation/libinstr2, and those are C++ sources.
>
> $ ls osprey/instrumentation/libinstr2/
> Exported              libinstr.vs            profile_interface.h
> Makefile.gbase        profile.cxx            utils.h
> dump.cxx              profile.h              vector.h
> dump.h                profile_aux.h
> hash_map.h            profile_interface.cxx
>
> I don't know if anyone uses instrumentation/libinstr/ but those sources
> are in C++ too.  There doesn't actually seem to be many diffs between
> these two directories.
>
> It looks like we have a local fix here to
> instrumentation/libinstr2/Makefile.gbase that hasn't been merged back
> yet.  This fix sets CXXFLAGS when BUILD_OPTIMIZE is set to DEBUG in
> order to include -fno-exceptions when building in DEBUG mode.  I believe
> the current sources will work now if you don't build this library in
> DEBUG mode.
>
> Steve Ellcey
> s...@cup.hp.com
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by
>
> Make an app they can't live without
> Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/RIM-dev2dev
> _______________________________________________
> Open64-devel mailing list
> Open64-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/open64-devel
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by
>
> Make an app they can't live without
> Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/RIM-dev2dev
> _______________________________________________
> Open64-devel mailing list
> Open64-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/open64-devel
>
>



-- 
Regards,
Lai Jian-Xin

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by 

Make an app they can't live without
Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge
http://p.sf.net/sfu/RIM-dev2dev 
_______________________________________________
Open64-devel mailing list
Open64-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/open64-devel

Reply via email to