Suneel Jain wrote: > I thought that this reliance on the compiler doing dead code > elimination at all optimization levels is all over the Linux > kernel code. > > My recommendation would be to do this kind of dead code > elimination at -O0 in Open64. That will provide greater compatibility > with gcc. > Is there any benefit outside of gcc compatibility? What are the disadvantages? This broadly impacts *all* code that is/will be built with -O0 over 1 bad line of code. Someone should make a concise and clear decision about at which point compatibility makes sense. This seems like a knee jerk decision
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The ultimate all-in-one performance toolkit: Intel(R) Parallel Studio XE: Pinpoint memory and threading errors before they happen. Find and fix more than 250 security defects in the development cycle. Locate bottlenecks in serial and parallel code that limit performance. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devfeb _______________________________________________ Open64-devel mailing list Open64-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/open64-devel
