I don't fully understand, if I2I2ILOAD is illegal, shouldn't the generation of such be disabled? What SL did wrong was handling it. Shouldn't the correct fix be in wgen or something like that? The way it is, cg can see this code at O0 level, or if wopt is not ran Sun
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 8:17 PM, Jian-Xin Lai <laij...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > Can a gate keeper review the patch for I2I2ILOAD bug found in #695? Thank > you very much. > https://bugs.open64.net/show_bug.cgi?id=695 > > Based on previous discussion with Fred, I2I2ILOAD is illegal in WHIRL IR. > Basically, this patch is to remove SL's previous patch for I2I2ILOAD. > > -- > Regards, > Lai Jian-Xin > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Free Software Download: Index, Search & Analyze Logs and other IT data in > Real-Time with Splunk. Collect, index and harness all the fast moving IT > data > generated by your applications, servers and devices whether physical, > virtual > or in the cloud. Deliver compliance at lower cost and gain new business > insights. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-dev2dev > _______________________________________________ > Open64-devel mailing list > Open64-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/open64-devel > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Free Software Download: Index, Search & Analyze Logs and other IT data in Real-Time with Splunk. Collect, index and harness all the fast moving IT data generated by your applications, servers and devices whether physical, virtual or in the cloud. Deliver compliance at lower cost and gain new business insights. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Open64-devel mailing list Open64-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/open64-devel
