I guess the original fix has problem and we might as well remove it.
Sun
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 12:52 AM, Steve Ellcey <s...@cup.hp.com> wrote:
>
> I have tested a compiler with the code in question removed. Using the
> testsuites I have available here at HP I have not found any regressions
> due to removing the code. So I would like to propose this patch as the
> fix for bug 497. Can a gatekeeper approve it?
>
> Steve Ellcey
> s...@cup.hp.com
>
>
>
> $ svn diff osprey/wgen/wgen_expr.cxx
> Index: osprey/wgen/wgen_expr.cxx
> ===================================================================
> --- osprey/wgen/wgen_expr.cxx (revision 3490)
> +++ osprey/wgen/wgen_expr.cxx (working copy)
> @@ -6884,13 +6884,6 @@
> wn = WN_Cvt(MTYPE_I4, mtyp, wn0);
> else wn = WN_Cvt(WN_rtype(wn0), mtyp, wn0);
> }
> -#if !defined(TARG_SL)
> - // bug 14430: Generate a CVT with the same signedness.
> - else if (MTYPE_signed(WN_rtype(wn0)) != MTYPE_signed(mtyp) &&
> - MTYPE_bit_size(WN_rtype(wn0)) > MTYPE_bit_size(mtyp)) {
> - wn = WN_Cvt(Mtype_TransferSign(mtyp, WN_rtype(wn0)), mtyp, wn0);
> - }
> -#endif
> else
> #endif
> wn = WN_Cvt(WN_rtype(wn0), mtyp, wn0);
>
>
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Free Software Download: Index, Search & Analyze Logs and other IT data in
Real-Time with Splunk. Collect, index and harness all the fast moving IT data
generated by your applications, servers and devices whether physical, virtual
or in the cloud. Deliver compliance at lower cost and gain new business
insights. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Open64-devel mailing list
Open64-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/open64-devel
