I reviewed this patch. I think this is a good fix.
2011/3/12 Gilmore, Doug <doug.gilm...@amd.com>
> Is there any chance that a gatekeeper could review this change soon?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Doug
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Gilmore, Doug [mailto:doug.gilm...@amd.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2011 12:22 PM
> > To: open64-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> > Subject: [Open64-devel] Review request for fix to OpenMP runtime bug
> > 742
> >
> > The OpenMP 2.5 SPEC states:
> >
> > 2.8.2 threadprivate Directive
> > ...
> > Each copy of a threadprivate object is initialized once, in the manner
> > specified by the program, but at an unspecified point in the program
> > prior to the first reference to that copy.
> >
> > I attached a test example that works with gcc, icc, but not Open64.
> >
> > The attached patch fixes the problem in the Open64 runtime.
> >
> > Could a gatekeeper review/approve this change when they have the
> > chance?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Doug
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Colocation vs. Managed Hosting
> A question and answer guide to determining the best fit
> for your organization - today and in the future.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/internap-sfd2d
> _______________________________________________
> Open64-devel mailing list
> Open64-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/open64-devel
>
--
Regards,
Lai Jian-Xin
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Colocation vs. Managed Hosting
A question and answer guide to determining the best fit
for your organization - today and in the future.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/internap-sfd2d
_______________________________________________
Open64-devel mailing list
Open64-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/open64-devel
