> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sun Chan [mailto:sun.c...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, May 23, 2011 6:26 PM
> To: Ye, Mei
> Cc: open64-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Open64-devel] code review - fix for Bug #778
> LFTR is not a safe optimization and never will be
> Sun
Note Mei's comment at the end of her messasge:
> > Although this work still will not make LFTR 100% safe, but it should cover a
> > vast majority.
She agrees with you, her change just makes LFTR safer.

Doug
> 
> On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 8:53 AM, Ye, Mei <mei...@amd.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > My earlier check-in r3502 forces loop end-test comparison to be "unsigned"
> > in the Linear Function Test Replacement (LFTR) phase.  This fixes an
> > ...
> > Although this work still will not make LFTR 100% safe, but it should cover a
> > vast majority.
> >


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
vRanger cuts backup time in half-while increasing security.
With the market-leading solution for virtual backup and recovery, 
you get blazing-fast, flexible, and affordable data protection.
Download your free trial now. 
http://p.sf.net/sfu/quest-d2dcopy1
_______________________________________________
Open64-devel mailing list
Open64-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/open64-devel

Reply via email to