it's probably better to break this into 2. One the suggested WHIRL
change, then, the optimization using that. We will need WHIRL change
(together with WHIRL doc change) approved first, before the
optimizaiton changes
Sun

On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 2:48 PM, Sun Chan <sun.c...@gmail.com> wrote:
> looks good to me.
> One note. May be it's time to remove this PSC_TO_OPENCC ifdef. But,
> double check that first. Thx!
> Sun
>
> On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 2:31 PM, Mathew, Pallavi <pallavi.mat...@amd.com> 
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Can a gatekeeper please review the attached patch related to dwarf
>> information generation?
>>
>>
>>
>> Testcase:
>>
>>  Any C or FORTRAN program compiled with -g.
>>
>> Description/Fix:
>>
>>  The value of the  DWARF DW_AT_producer attribute produced by the opencc and
>> openf90 compilers is incorrect.
>>
>>  openf90 generates "path90 <ver>" while opencc generates "openCC <ver>".
>>
>>  Correct the DW_AT_producer attribute in the DW_TAG_compile_unit DIE for
>> openf90 and opencc.
>>
>>  Also add the DW_AT_low_pc and DW_AT_high_pc to the DW_TAG_compile_unit DIE.
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> -Pallavi
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> EditLive Enterprise is the world's most technically advanced content
>> authoring tool. Experience the power of Track Changes, Inline Image
>> Editing and ensure content is compliant with Accessibility Checking.
>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/ephox-dev2dev
>> _______________________________________________
>> Open64-devel mailing list
>> Open64-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/open64-devel
>>
>>
>

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
EditLive Enterprise is the world's most technically advanced content
authoring tool. Experience the power of Track Changes, Inline Image
Editing and ensure content is compliant with Accessibility Checking.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/ephox-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Open64-devel mailing list
Open64-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/open64-devel

Reply via email to