The unrelated-stuff make the compiler build broken. So, we have to fix it.
Thanks
Gang
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 10:31 AM, Sun Chan <sun.c...@gmail.com> wrote:
> does this implementation make sense for you folks?
> Sun
>
> On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 10:28 AM, Gang Yu <yugang...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Sun:
> >
> > We have a check on this (Is_Target_SSE41()), it is defined in
> > osprey/common/com/X8664/config_targ.h:
> >
> > 182#define Is_Target_SSE41() (Target_SSE41 == TRUE)
> >
> > We believe it is unrelated to other targets, so still should we define
> this
> > Is_Target_SSE41() for other targets?
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Gang
> >
> >
> > On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 7:03 AM, Sun Chan <sun.c...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> i meant the #ifdef be done inside the function Is_Target_SSE4()
> >> Sun
> >>
> >> On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 5:28 PM, Gang Yu <yugang...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > Thanks, you are right. The LNO_Iter_threshold is set based on target.
> >> > So,
> >> >
> >> > Index: osprey/common/com/config_lno.cxx
> >> > ===================================================================
> >> > --- osprey/common/com/config_lno.cxx (revision 3682)
> >> > +++ osprey/common/com/config_lno.cxx (working copy)
> >> > @@ -1232,7 +1232,9 @@
> >> > the flag is set based on target. Otherwise use user-specified
> >> > value.
> >> > */
> >> > if(LNO_Iter_threshold == 1) {
> >> > +#ifdef TARG_X8664
> >> > LNO_Iter_threshold = (Is_Target_SSE41())? 8 : 0;
> >> > +#endif
> >> > }
> >> > }
> >> >
> >> > Index: osprey/be/cg/whirl2ops.cxx
> >> > ==============================
> >> > =====================================
> >> > --- osprey/be/cg/whirl2ops.cxx (revision 3681)
> >> > +++ osprey/cg/whirl2ops.cxx (working copy)
> >> > @@ -3166,6 +3166,7 @@
> >> > WN *compare;
> >> > VARIANT variant;
> >> >
> >> > +#ifdef TARG_X8664
> >> > if (opcode == OPC_V16I1V16I1SELECT) {
> >> > TN* op1 = Expand_Expr(WN_kid0(select), select, NULL);
> >> > TN* op2 = Expand_Expr(WN_kid1(select), select, NULL);
> >> > @@ -3177,6 +3178,7 @@
> >> > Expand_Select(result, op1, op2, op3, MTYPE_V16I1, FALSE,
> &New_OPs);
> >> > //FALSE passed as dummy arg
> >> > return result;
> >> > }
> >> > +#endif
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Gang
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 5:15 PM, Sun Chan <sun.c...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> the #ifdef can be done inside Is_target_SSE...
> >> >> Sun
> >> >>
> >> >> On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 1:24 AM, Gang Yu <yugang...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> > Hi,
> >> >> >
> >> >> > SL target builds fail today due to the LNO check-in v3681, the
> >> >> > build
> >> >> > fail
> >> >> > comes from the patch:
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Index: config_lno.cxx
> >> >> > ===================================================================
> >> >> > --- config_lno.cxx (revision 3643)
> >> >> > +++ config_lno.cxx (revision 3681)
> >> >> > @@ -1224,5 +1227,12 @@
> >> >> > Mhd_Options.L[i].TLB_Miss_Penalty;
> >> >> > }
> >> >> > }
> >> >> > +
> >> >> > + /* Value of 1 for LNO_Iter_threshold is interpreted as default
> in
> >> >> > which
> >> >> > case
> >> >> > + the flag is set based on target. Otherwise use user-specified
> >> >> > value.
> >> >> > + */
> >> >> > + if(LNO_Iter_threshold == 1) {
> >> >> > + LNO_Iter_threshold = (Is_Target_SSE41())? 8 : 0;
> >> >> > + }
> >> >> > }
> >> >> > Index: /home/yugang/trunk/trunk/osprey/be/cg/whirl2ops.cxx
> >> >> > ===================================================================
> >> >> > --- /home/yugang/trunk/trunk/osprey/be/cg/whirl2ops.cxx (revision
> >> >> > 3666)
> >> >> > +++ /home/yugang/trunk/trunk/osprey/be/cg/whirl2ops.cxx (revision
> >> >> > 3681)
> >> >> > @@ -3166,9 +3166,18 @@
> >> >> > WN *compare;
> >> >> > VARIANT variant;
> >> >> >
> >> >> > + if (opcode == OPC_V16I1V16I1SELECT) {
> >> >> > + TN* op1 = Expand_Expr(WN_kid0(select), select, NULL);
> >> >> > + TN* op2 = Expand_Expr(WN_kid1(select), select, NULL);
> >> >> > + TN* op3 = Expand_Expr(WN_kid2(select), select, NULL);
> >> >> >
> >> >> > + if (result == NULL)
> >> >> > + result = Allocate_Result_TN (select, NULL);
> >> >> > +
> >> >> > + Expand_Select(result, op1, op2, op3, MTYPE_V16I1, FALSE,
> >> >> > &New_OPs);
> >> >> > //FALSE passed as dummy arg
> >> >> > + return result;
> >> >> > + }
> >> >> >
> >> >> > the "Is_Target_SSE41()", "OPC_V16I1V16I1SELECT" and "MTYPE_V16I1"
> are
> >> >> > specific to X86 targets, these patches will cause other targets
> fail,
> >> >> >
> >> >> > The suggest patche is:
> >> >> > Index: config_lno.cxx
> >> >> > ===================================================================
> >> >> > --- config_lno.cxx (revision 3681)
> >> >> > +++ config_lno.cxx (working copy)
> >> >> > @@ -1228,11 +1228,13 @@
> >> >> > }
> >> >> > }
> >> >> >
> >> >> > +#ifdef TARG_X8664
> >> >> > /* Value of 1 for LNO_Iter_threshold is interpreted as default
> in
> >> >> > which
> >> >> > case
> >> >> > the flag is set based on target. Otherwise use user-specified
> >> >> > value.
> >> >> > */
> >> >> > if(LNO_Iter_threshold == 1) {
> >> >> > LNO_Iter_threshold = (Is_Target_SSE41())? 8 : 0;
> >> >> > }
> >> >> > +#endif
> >> >> > }
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Index: ../../be/cg/whirl2ops.cxx
> >> >> > ===================================================================
> >> >> > --- ../../be/cg/whirl2ops.cxx (revision 3681)
> >> >> > +++ ../../be/cg/whirl2ops.cxx (working copy)
> >> >> > @@ -3166,6 +3166,7 @@
> >> >> > WN *compare;
> >> >> > VARIANT variant;
> >> >> >
> >> >> > +#ifdef TARG_X8664
> >> >> > if (opcode == OPC_V16I1V16I1SELECT) {
> >> >> > TN* op1 = Expand_Expr(WN_kid0(select), select, NULL);
> >> >> > TN* op2 = Expand_Expr(WN_kid1(select), select, NULL);
> >> >> > @@ -3177,6 +3178,7 @@
> >> >> > Expand_Select(result, op1, op2, op3, MTYPE_V16I1, FALSE,
> >> >> > &New_OPs);
> >> >> > //FALSE passed as dummy arg
> >> >> > return result;
> >> >> > }
> >> >> > +#endif
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Would a gatekeeper help a review?
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Thanks
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Gang
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> >> > All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously
> >> >> > valuable.
> >> >> > Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance,
> >> >> > security
> >> >> > threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and
> >> >> > makes
> >> >> > sense of it. IT sense. And common sense.
> >> >> > http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-c2
> >> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> >> > Open64-devel mailing list
> >> >> > Open64-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> >> >> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/open64-devel
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >
> >
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable.
Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security
threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes
sense of it. IT sense. And common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-c2
_______________________________________________
Open64-devel mailing list
Open64-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/open64-devel
