Looks fine.

2011/8/23 Rao, Shivarama <shivarama....@amd.com>

> Hi,
>
> ** **
>
> Could a gatekeeper please review and approve the following patch.****
>
> ** **
>
> This patch fixes a  missing return statement error in SC_NODE::Get_bounds
> function.****
>
> ** **
>
> Index: osprey/be/opt/opt_proactive.cxx****
>
> ===================================================================****
>
> --- osprey/be/opt/opt_proactive.cxx     (revision 3725)****
>
> +++ osprey/be/opt/opt_proactive.cxx     (working copy)****
>
> @@ -1352,6 +1352,8 @@****
>
>    *p_start = wn_start;****
>
>    *p_end = wn_end;****
>
>    *p_step = wn_step;****
>
> +****
>
> +  return TRUE;****
>
> }****
>
> ** **
>
> // Get upper bound of 'sc'.****
>
> ** **
>
> Regards,****
>
> ** **
>
> Shivaram****
>
> AMD Open Source Compiler Engineering****
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Get a FREE DOWNLOAD! and learn more about uberSVN rich system,
> user administration capabilities and model configuration. Take
> the hassle out of deploying and managing Subversion and the
> tools developers use with it. http://p.sf.net/sfu/wandisco-d2d-2
>
> _______________________________________________
> Open64-devel mailing list
> Open64-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/open64-devel
>
>


-- 
Regards,
Lai Jian-Xin
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Get a FREE DOWNLOAD! and learn more about uberSVN rich system, 
user administration capabilities and model configuration. Take 
the hassle out of deploying and managing Subversion and the 
tools developers use with it. http://p.sf.net/sfu/wandisco-d2d-2
_______________________________________________
Open64-devel mailing list
Open64-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/open64-devel

Reply via email to