Hi,
Could a gate keeper review this patch? Thank you very much.

2011/9/7 Jian-Xin Lai <laij...@gmail.com>

> Hi,
>
> Could a gate keeper review the patch for #827? Thank you very much.
>
> The error message should be reported at toplev.c, line 884:
>     874   if (TREE_CODE (decl) == FUNCTION_DECL
>     875       && DECL_INITIAL (decl) == 0
>     876       && DECL_EXTERNAL (decl)
>     877       && ! DECL_ARTIFICIAL (decl)
>     878       && ! TREE_NO_WARNING (decl)
>     879       && ! TREE_PUBLIC (decl)
>     880       && (warn_unused_function
>     881           || TREE_SYMBOL_REFERENCED (DECL_ASSEMBLER_NAME (decl))))
>     882     {
>     883       if (TREE_SYMBOL_REFERENCED (DECL_ASSEMBLER_NAME (decl)))
>     884         pedwarn ("%q+F used but never defined", decl);
>     885       else
>     886         warning (0, "%q+F declared %<static%> but never defined",
> decl);
>     887       /* This symbol is effectively an "extern" declaration now.
> */
>     888       TREE_PUBLIC (decl) = 1;
>     889       assemble_external (decl);
>     890     }
>
>
> But because the TREE_SYMBOL_REFERENCED (DECL_ASSEMBLER_NAME (decl)) is not
> set for the callee in this case, the compiler doesn't report any error on
> this case. The patch is to set this flag when handle the CALL_EXPR:
>
> Index: /open64/open64-trunk/osprey-gcc-4.2.0/gcc/tree.c
> ===================================================================
> --- /open64/open64-trunk/osprey-gcc-4.2.0/gcc/tree.c    (revision 3731)
> +++ /open64/open64-trunk/osprey-gcc-4.2.0/gcc/tree.c    (working copy)
> @@ -10916,6 +10916,16 @@
>               /* bug 12598: Try to fold OBJ_TYPE_REF if it is present
>                  under the CALL_EXPR. Code adapted from fold_stmt() . */
>               tree callee = get_callee_fndecl (t);
> +              if (callee && TREE_CODE(callee) == FUNCTION_DECL)
> +              {
> +                 /* we need to emit the function be calleed, no matter
> +                    if the call is removed later by gcc cfg cleanup, so
> +                    the open64 backend wouldn't be surprised by missing
> +                    function definition. */
> +                 TREE_SYMBOL_REFERENCED (DECL_ASSEMBLER_NAME (callee)) =
> 1;
> +                 mark_decl_referenced(callee);
> +              }
> +
>               if (!(callee && DECL_BUILT_IN(callee)))
>               {
>                 callee = TREE_OPERAND(t,0);
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Lai Jian-Xin
>



-- 
Regards,
Lai Jian-Xin
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BlackBerry&reg; DevCon Americas, Oct. 18-20, San Francisco, CA
Learn about the latest advances in developing for the 
BlackBerry&reg; mobile platform with sessions, labs & more.
See new tools and technologies. Register for BlackBerry&reg; DevCon today!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/rim-devcon-copy1 
_______________________________________________
Open64-devel mailing list
Open64-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/open64-devel

Reply via email to