I am ok with the change, except the formatting. Pls put all small functions
(declaration and body) in the same line like any C++ people always do.
Sun

On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 2:49 AM, shenrfen <shenr...@gmail.com> wrote:

>  Hi, all.****
>
>          Could a gatekeeper help to review the patch for bug879.****
>
>          Please find the detail:
> https://bugs.open64.net/show_bug.cgi?id=879 ****
>
>          I would like to add a member "line" to Class "ST".****
>
> ** **
>
>                    +    mUINT32 line;           // The line num where
> define the sym in the source file.****
>
>          With this field we can get the line info which define symbol.****
>
>          Attached Please fine the whole patch. The patch has passed SL’s
> regression test.****
>
>          Thx very much.****
>
> ** **
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: bugzilla-dae...@open64.net [mailto:bugzilla-dae...@open64.net]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2011 2:56 PM
> To: shenr...@gmail.com
> Subject: [Bug 879] New: Missing line number of uninitialized variable
> warning****
>
> ** **
>
> https://bugs.open64.net/show_bug.cgi?id=879****
>
> ** **
>
>            Summary: Missing line number of uninitialized variable warning*
> ***
>
>            Product: Open64 Compiler****
>
>            Version: 4.2.4****
>
>           Platform: Itanium****
>
>         OS/Version: Linux****
>
>             Status: NEW****
>
>           Severity: normal****
>
>           Priority: P2****
>
>          Component: WOPT****
>
>         AssignedTo: shenr...@gmail.com****
>
>         ReportedBy: shenr...@gmail.com****
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> Test case: 1.c****
>
>     int main()****
>
>     {****
>
>       int z;****
>
>       return z;****
>
>     }****
>
> ** **
>
> CMD:****
>
>     opencc 1.c -WOPT:warn_uninit=1****
>
> ** **
>
> Building output:****
>
>     "1.c": Warning: Variable z in main might be used uninitialized****
>
> ** **
>
> Error:****
>
>     There is missing line number of variable, Which is difficult to locate
> ****
>
> variable.****
>
> ** **
>
> -- ****
>
> Configure bugmail: https://bugs.open64.net/userprefs.cgi?tab=email****
>
> ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------****
>
> You are the assignee for the bug.****
>
> You reported the bug.****
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a
> definitive record of customers, application performance, security
> threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this data and makes
> sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. Common sense.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-oct
> _______________________________________________
> Open64-devel mailing list
> Open64-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/open64-devel
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a
definitive record of customers, application performance, security
threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this data and makes
sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. Common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-oct
_______________________________________________
Open64-devel mailing list
Open64-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/open64-devel

Reply via email to