thx for pointing this out, it could cause  problem for automatic bug triaging.
Sun

On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 1:34 AM, Ye, Mei <mei...@amd.com> wrote:
> I don't have objection to this fix.  But this bug exposes a design problem in 
> DCE, i.e.,
> DCE can't handle a situation where copy prop is disabled upstream.
>
> -Mei
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sun Chan [mailto:sun.c...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, January 06, 2012 9:55 PM
> To: Gang Yu
> Cc: open64-devel
> Subject: Re: [Open64-devel] Review request for fix bug787[WOPT]
>
> this fix looks better. i am still a bit worry about regressions
> (performance). Have you checked perf regression with this change?
> Sun
>
> On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 1:36 PM, Gang Yu <yugang...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>>  I have a new fix for the bug787, the cut-down case from Rao(thanks) is as
>> follows:
>>
>> extern int main(int argc)
>> {
>>   int res1;
>>   int val0,val1;
>>   val1=100;
>>   if(1)
>>   {
>>     asm("bswapl %0" : "=r" (val0) : "0" (val1));
>>     res1=val0;
>>   }
>>   val0=res1;
>>   asm("bswapl %0" : "=r" (val1) : "0" (val0));
>> } /* main */
>> analysis:
>>
>> Current open64 disallows copy propagation into ASM_INPUT for the var and
>> ivar cases, this is reasonable since some constraints do only allow the
>> parameter in specific form.
>>
>> If we fix following Rao's suggested way, i.e, mark some identity assignment
>> undeletable for DCE, then we need special marking work for the identity
>> assignment.
>>
>> a sound way as RAO suggested is say if the LHS of the identity assignment
>> has flag CR_DONT_PROP, we disable deleting this identiy assign. However,
>> this triggers the problem that other identity assign also undeletable only
>> if its LHS has CR_DONT_PROP, so bug882 thrown out and it is hard to patch
>> again for this special handling, this changes the default verifycation
>> and DCE behavior.
>>
>> My suggested way is that we try propagate to a var inside ASM_INPUT, if the
>> propagated expr is also a var, we allow this propagation. in the above case
>>
>>>LINE 13___
>>> LDID I4 I4 sym5v3 0 ty=402  <u=2 cr13> flags:0x8 b=-1 #res1
>>>OPR_STID I4 I4 sym4v4 0 <u=0 cr15> b=-1 flags:0x2 pj2 Sid-1
>> chi <> 0x0x80e1e40
>>>LINE 14___
>>  mu<9/cr14 >
>>>   LDID I4 I4 sym4v4 0 ty=402  <u=0 cr15> flags:0x0 b=-1 #val0
>>>  ASM_INPUT opnd:1 <u=0 cr16> isop_flags:0xc0000 flags:0x0 b=E1
>>> ASM_STMT <u=0 cr17> isop_flags:0xc0000 flags:0x0 b=-1
>>>OPR_ASM_STMT b=-1 flags:0x2 pj2 Sid-1
>> sym5v3 is propagated into OPR_ASMINPUT.
>>
>> The patch below:
>>
>> --- a/osprey/be/opt/opt_prop.cxx
>> +++ b/osprey/be/opt/opt_prop.cxx
>> @@ -1504,9 +1504,23 @@ COPYPROP::Copy_propagate_cr(CODEREP *x, BB_NODE
>> *curbb,
>>           expr = Copy_propagate_cr(x->Opnd(i), curbb, inside_cse, in_array);
>>          else {
>>           // OSP_384
>> -         if(opr == OPR_ASM_INPUT)
>> -           x->Opnd(i)->Set_flag(CF_DONT_PROP);
>> -          expr = NULL;
>> +         if(opr == OPR_ASM_INPUT) {
>> +            // open64.net bug787. Try propagate for VAR first, if the
>> propagated expr is the same
>> +            // kind to the original one,i.e, also a VAR. we allow this
>> propagation. otherwise, disable it.
>> +            if ( x->Opnd(i)->Kind() == CK_VAR ) {
>> +              CODEREP *possible_prop = Copy_propagate_cr(x->Opnd(i), curbb,
>> inside_cse, in_array);
>> +              if (possible_prop && possible_prop->Kind() ==
>> x->Opnd(i)->Kind())
>> +                expr = possible_prop;
>> +              else {
>> +                x->Opnd(i)->Set_flag(CF_DONT_PROP);
>> +                expr = NULL;
>> +              }
>> +            }
>> +            else {
>> +              x->Opnd(i)->Set_flag(CF_DONT_PROP);
>> +              expr = NULL;
>> +            }
>> +          }
>>         }
>>  #else
>> please gatekeeper help a review
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> Regards
>> Gang
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Ridiculously easy VDI. With Citrix VDI-in-a-Box, you don't need a complex
>> infrastructure or vast IT resources to deliver seamless, secure access to
>> virtual desktops. With this all-in-one solution, easily deploy virtual
>> desktops for less than the cost of PCs and save 60% on VDI infrastructure
>> costs. Try it free! http://p.sf.net/sfu/Citrix-VDIinabox
>> _______________________________________________
>> Open64-devel mailing list
>> Open64-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/open64-devel
>>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Ridiculously easy VDI. With Citrix VDI-in-a-Box, you don't need a complex
> infrastructure or vast IT resources to deliver seamless, secure access to
> virtual desktops. With this all-in-one solution, easily deploy virtual
> desktops for less than the cost of PCs and save 60% on VDI infrastructure
> costs. Try it free! http://p.sf.net/sfu/Citrix-VDIinabox
> _______________________________________________
> Open64-devel mailing list
> Open64-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/open64-devel
>
>

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Write once. Port to many.
Get the SDK and tools to simplify cross-platform app development. Create 
new or port existing apps to sell to consumers worldwide. Explore the 
Intel AppUpSM program developer opportunity. appdeveloper.intel.com/join
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-appdev
_______________________________________________
Open64-devel mailing list
Open64-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/open64-devel

Reply via email to