Looks like this fix is generic and no need for #ifdef, don't you think? sun
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 5:52 PM, Rao, Shivarama <shivarama....@amd.com> wrote: > Hi, > > > > Could a gate keeper please review the attached patch to fix bug #944. > > > > This fix solves a problem in debugging the open64 generated binaries. > Currently if we compile a file which is in different directory than the > working directory, it cannot be debugged. > > > > $pwd > > /tmp > > $opencc –g test_dir/t1.c > > $gdb a.out > > (gdb) b main > > (gdb) run > > Breakpoint 1, main () at t1.c:6 > > 6 t1.c: No such file or directory. > > in t1.c > > > > We don’t generate the path information for “.file” directives in the > generated assembly and due to this directory table entries are not not > created correctly. This patch generates the “.file” directives similar to > gcc and fixes the problem. > > > > Regards, > > Shivaram > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Keep Your Developer Skills Current with LearnDevNow! > The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft developers > is just $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL - plus HTML5, CSS3, MVC3, > Metro Style Apps, more. Free future releases when you subscribe now! > http://p.sf.net/sfu/learndevnow-d2d > _______________________________________________ > Open64-devel mailing list > Open64-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/open64-devel > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Keep Your Developer Skills Current with LearnDevNow! The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft developers is just $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL - plus HTML5, CSS3, MVC3, Metro Style Apps, more. Free future releases when you subscribe now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/learndevnow-d2d _______________________________________________ Open64-devel mailing list Open64-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/open64-devel
