please go ahead. Sun On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 1:15 PM, David Coakley <dcoak...@gmail.com> wrote: > Did any gatekeepers get a chance to consider this change? I have not > received any feedback. > > On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 10:35 PM, David Coakley <dcoak...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I would like to "svn delete" the unused osprey-gcc directory to reduce >> the size of the Open64 source tree. This directory contains the GCC >> 4.0-based front end which has been completely superseded by the GCC >> 4.2-based front end (osprey-gcc-4.2.0). All references to osprey-gcc >> were removed over a year ago in commit r3276. >> >> Could a gatekeeper give approval? Thanks, >> >> -David Coakley / AMD Open Source Compiler Engineering > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > This SF email is sponsosred by: > Try Windows Azure free for 90 days Click Here > http://p.sf.net/sfu/sfd2d-msazure > _______________________________________________ > Open64-devel mailing list > Open64-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/open64-devel
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF email is sponsosred by: Try Windows Azure free for 90 days Click Here http://p.sf.net/sfu/sfd2d-msazure _______________________________________________ Open64-devel mailing list Open64-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/open64-devel
