Looks good to me. Please go ahead.
2012/4/11 Berg, Michael <michael.b...@amd.com>
> 2nd request, can a gate keeper please review these changes.****
>
> ** **
>
> Thanks****
>
> ** **
>
> -Michael****
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* Berg, Michael [mailto:michael.b...@amd.com]
> *Sent:* Monday, March 26, 2012 4:31 PM
>
> *To:* 'open64-devel@lists.sourceforge.net'
> *Subject:* [Open64-devel] code review (CG)****
>
> ** **
>
> Attached is a patch with several small components in it, they are:****
>
> ****
>
> * 256 bit support for fma****
>
> * A change limiting cmp load-execute uses to 1****
>
> * Amendments to cg for –r3881 for non temporal stores****
>
> * Repairing the result of a Binary_And in expansion to utilize a tmp
> result reg on an interior expression****
>
> * Some cleanup in CG_sched****
>
> ** **
>
> Can a gate keeper please view these changes.****
>
> ** **
>
> Thanks****
>
> ** **
>
> -Michael****
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Better than sec? Nothing is better than sec when it comes to
> monitoring Big Data applications. Try Boundary one-second
> resolution app monitoring today. Free.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-dev2dev
> _______________________________________________
> Open64-devel mailing list
> Open64-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/open64-devel
>
>
--
Regards,
Lai Jian-Xin
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Better than sec? Nothing is better than sec when it comes to
monitoring Big Data applications. Try Boundary one-second
resolution app monitoring today. Free.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Open64-devel mailing list
Open64-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/open64-devel
