Ecco, questo è un signor documento.
On Sunday, 10 June 2012, Cal. <[email protected]> wrote: > da http://falkvinge.net/pirate-wheel/principles/privacy/ > > These privacies may only be violated by dedicated authorities on > concrete, prior, andindividual suspicion of a specific, committed, and > serious crime. Let’s see what this means: > Dedicated authorities: Only law enforcement may break the privacy. > Your doctor and dentist, for instance, will always be on your side. > You will always know which authority has which role in society — and > only law enforcement works with enforcing law and potentially > violating your privacy in working against you. > Concrete suspicion: If privacy is to be violated, it must be because > of a formal, concrete suspicion. Usually this means that somebody has > been identified as a suspect somewhere in a file. > Prior suspicion: Privacy may only be violated after suspicion of a > crime has been identified. > Individual suspicion: Privacy may only be violated after the suspect > has been individually identified. Violating the privacy of many > citizens to find the suspect is a violation of the fundamental rights > of these citizens; they would not be under individual suspicion when > that happens. > Specific crime: If your privacy is to be violated, you must be under > suspicion of a specific crime — say, the bank robbery on May 15, 2010 > against Sillybank Ltd on King’s Road in Duckville, Kansas. You cannot > be under suspicion for bank robbery in general. > Committed crime: The dedicated authorities may only violate your > privacy for an already-committed crime, and never to prevent you from > committing one. Your decisions are yours right up until the point > where you may or may not choose to break the law. > Serious crime: The dedicated authorities may only violate privacy for > a serious crime. Where this limit lies will vary from legislation to > legislation, but let’s establish that murder is serious and that > shoplifting is not. Typically, the limit would vary between the > different kinds of privacy, but a baseline would be an expected six > months in prison as a minimum seriousness for violating any privacy. > In violating somebody’s privacy, the dedicated authorities are on > their own. Under no circumstance may they demand the cooperation of > the suspected citizen in violating his or her own privacy, such as > demanding a surrender of passwords, in the process of conducting an > investigation. No person can be obligated to incriminate nor clear > him- or herself of guilt. > Further, they may only use material against an individual that was > gathered with the goal of investigating the specific crime which > justified violating privacy in the first place. > Unwillingness to voluntarily surrender privacy rights is never grounds > for suspicion of any crime. > _______________________________________________ > Open mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.partito-pirata.it/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/open > _______________________________________________ Open mailing list [email protected] http://lists.partito-pirata.it/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/open
