Il 12/02/2012 20:11, /dar ha scritto: > Inutile commentare certe idiozie. > > Se stavate cercando qualcuno di piu' paranoico di voi, all'fbi trovate > uffici pieni credo.
forse forse .... hai sbagliato lista? non ho capito cosa intendie a chi ti rivolgi... :-) personalmente una TAILS mi risolve la paranoia... non so te :P ciao! l. > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: [tor-talk] Do You Like Online Privacy? You May Be a Terrorist > Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2012 10:54:30 -0700 > From: "Christopher A. Lindsey" <CLindsey@locancelloperdecenza> > To: [email protected] > Reply-To: [email protected] > >> From an article at: > http://publicintelligence.net/do-you-like-online-privacy-you-may-be-a-terrorist/ > > > February 1, 2012 in News > > Public Intelligence > > A flyer [1] designed by the FBI and the Department of Justice to promote > suspicious activity reporting in internet cafes lists basic tools used > for online privacy as potential signs of terrorist activity. The > document, part of a program called “Communities Against Terrorism”, > lists the use of “anonymizers, portals, or other means to shield IP > address” as a sign that a person could be engaged in or supporting > terrorist activity. The use of encryption is also listed as a > suspicious activity along with steganography, the practice of using > “software to hide encrypted data in digital photos” or other media. In > fact, the flyer recommends that anyone “overly concerned about privacy” > or attempting to “shield the screen from view of others” should be > considered suspicious and potentially engaged in terrorist activities. > > Logging into an account associated with a residential internet service > provider (such as Comcast or AOL), an activity that could simply > indicate that you are on a trip, is also considered a suspicious > activity. Viewing any content related to “military tactics” including > manuals or “revolutionary literature” is also considered a potential > indicator of terrorist activity. This would mean that viewing a number > of websites, including the one you are on right now, could be construed > by a hapless employee as an highly suspicious activity potentially > linking you to terrorism. > > The “Potential Indicators of Terrorist Activities” contained in the > flyer are not to be construed alone as a sign of terrorist activity and > the document notes that “just because someone’s speech, actions, > beliefs, appearance, or way of life is different; it does not mean that > he or she is suspicious.” However, many of the activities described in > the document are basic practices of any individual concerned with > security or privacy online. The use of PGP, VPNs, Tor or any of the > many other technologies for anonymity and privacy online are directly > targeted by the flyer, which is distributed to businesses in an effort > to promote the reporting of these activities. > > [1]http://publicintelligence.net/fbi-suspicious-activity-reporting-flyers/ > > Does anyone have any opinions on how this will impact Tor and it's users > in the United States? > > It seems to me that anyone wishing to use Tor to protect themselves, > especially at cafes, would start being unnecessarily harassed. > > Take care, > Chris > -- > -- > Christopher A. Lindsey > Garuda LLC > PGP Key: AFD4E820 > > -- > dar # dd if=/dev/urandom of=/dar/mind > > > _______________________________________________ > Open mailing list > [email protected] > http://ml.partito-pirata.it/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/open -- lilo GnuPG/PGP Key-Id: 0x5D172559 _______________________________________________ Open mailing list [email protected] http://ml.partito-pirata.it/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/open
