In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,Nathan Neulinger writes: >around. We typically have something like: >/afs/umr.edu/i386_linux22.36.2.3 >/afs/umr.edu/sun4x_56.34a.5.53 >/afs/umr.edu/sun4x_56.36.2.5 thinking about this @sys is something like platform_osversion. perhaps platform for linux systems should be linuxMACH_glibcVERS, something like linuxi386_glibc22. there is some precedent, like next_mach20, next really wasnt a processor but a platform. of course i386 is pretty silly since hardly anyone is really using an i386. additionally, you can also change the @sys value on a per system basis. perhaps this could be made more configurable. _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/openafs-devel
- [OpenAFS-devel] Initial concern about Linux 2.4 patch Sam Hartman
- Re: [OpenAFS-devel] Initial concern about Linux 2.... Chas Williams
- Re: [OpenAFS-devel] Initial concern about Linux 2.... Jeffrey Hutzelman
- Re: [OpenAFS-devel] Initial concern about Linux 2.... Russ Allbery
- Re: [OpenAFS-devel] Initial concern about Linux 2.... Derrick J Brashear
- Re: [OpenAFS-devel] Initial concern about Linux 2.... Nathan Neulinger
- Re: [OpenAFS-devel] Initial concern about Linu... Russ Allbery
- Re: [OpenAFS-devel] Initial concern about Linu... Chas Williams
- Re: [OpenAFS-devel] Initial concern about Linux 2.... Chas Williams
- Re: [OpenAFS-devel] Initial concern about Linux 2.... Jeffrey Hutzelman
- Re: [OpenAFS-devel] Initial concern about Linux 2.... Chas Williams
- Re: [OpenAFS-devel] Initial concern about Linu... Russ Allbery
- Re: [OpenAFS-devel] Initial concern about Linux 2.... Sam Hartman
- Re: [OpenAFS-devel] Initial concern about Linu... Nathan Neulinger
