In previous AFS versions, stat'ing an AFS mount point returns ENODEV for
an unknown volume, but ENOENT if the mount point is for an unknown cell.
A patch proposes to change that to consistently return ENODEV. Is anyone
relying on the distinction? Cases could be made for
-ENOENT represents a missing entry in the CellServDB for the cell
-mount points should be treated like dangling symlinks and always return
ENOENT when invalid
The latter would be a considerable semantic change, though.
-D
_______________________________________________
OpenAFS-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/openafs-devel
