> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chris Mason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2001 3:01 PM
> To: Neulinger, Nathan; 'Danilov Nikita'
> Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: RE: [reiserfs-list] RE: [OpenAFS-devel] weird issue with
> reiserfs on 2.4.3 and openaf s
>
>
>
>
> On Wednesday, April 11, 2001 01:25:23 PM -0500 "Neulinger, Nathan"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Actually, in the ideal case of an AFS cache being on it's
> own filesystem,
> > there should only be 1 directory on the whole filesystem (and maybe
> > lost+found), which is why it ran fine on 3.5.
> >
>
> If all AFS cache files are in one directory, and files don't
> get moved into
> that directory from elsewhere in the FS (ie mv /tmp/foo
> /afs_cache_dir),
> than
> the extra 32 bits of info reiserfs needs will always be the
> same as the
> inode number of the cache directory, and we can whip up
> something using
> iget4 to pass the extra info to reiserfs.
>
> Otherwise, we'll have to do something else (more details in
> another email).
The above presumptions are correct (unless user is doing something weird, in
which case, who cares).
-- Nathan
_______________________________________________
OpenAFS-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/openafs-devel
