In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,[EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
> <p>ia64_linux_24_22</p>
just a comment about the linux sysnames. it seems redundant to specify the
kernel version in there since that usually its the important piece. if i
had to do it over again, i would have renamed i386_linux22 to just i386_linux
using the '#if KERNEL_VERSION >' to handle any differences. this wouldnt
have taken into account glibc differences though.
if you have ia64_linux_24_22 and ia64_linux_22_22 you are going to have
two sets of afs binaries that are essentially the same. perhaps just
having i386_linux_22 (were 22 is the abi) would be 'better'? just
distribute/build the appropriate different kernel modules.
_______________________________________________
OpenAFS-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/openafs-devel
