Oh... I see... I didn't mean anything that specific in detail - just the
idea of ending up with a result where multiple volumes can share space on
disk similar to the way current clones work. I could care less how it was
physically implemented, but would want it to be compatible with existing afs
clients. 

-- Nathan

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sam Hartman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2001 12:12 PM
> To: Neulinger, Nathan
> Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: Re: [OpenAFS-devel] Suggestions for features/ideas...
> 
> 
> >>>>> "Neulinger," == Neulinger, Nathan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 
>     Neulinger,> I think that's what I meant - where merge == link to
>     Neulinger,> same data. Or are you meaning something else?
> 
> 
> Your message implied that you would mostly follow the file structure.
> I'm saying it would probably be easier to build a cache of hashes for
> all the data.  You'd want to link copies of the same file within a
> volume together.
> 
_______________________________________________
OpenAFS-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel

Reply via email to