Well, would the license for what was given to the openafs group cover the
HTML that is currently out on IBM's site? (or was at one point)
If so, I'd say - dump the pdf/ps and stick with the HTML docs which are at
least maintainable.
-- Nathan
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Derrick J Brashear [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2001 2:11 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [OpenAFS-devel] @sys as list patch in CVS
>
>
> On Tue, 5 Jun 2001, Neulinger, Nathan wrote:
>
> > Seems like this might be something to request from IBM -
> not likely to
> > happen, but would be worthwhile to at least ask for the
> source for the docs.
>
> It's been done before; They claimed not to have source for
> the PostScript
> (which inevitably was just converted to PDF directly)
>
> > I'm sure we could convert the pdf's to something with some
> work, but the end
> > result will be quite ugly unless a ton of by-hand work is done.
>
> By-hand work is going to need to be done regardless.
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenAFS-devel mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel
>
_______________________________________________
OpenAFS-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel
