> The issue is that on some systems, building kernel code forces the choice of
> what compiler to use, and often, the kernel compilers are very lacking (i.e.
> I know the c compiler on HP-UX used for the kernel has lots of limitations.)
Last I checked, if you asked HP, the thing called "cc" bundled with
hp-ux is not a compiler; it's only there to rebuild a single
automatically-generated source file constructed by config.
It does not seem unreasonable to require folks building kernel
extensions to get a real compiler -- either gcc or the vendor
compiler.
- Bill
_______________________________________________
OpenAFS-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel
- [OpenAFS-devel] which OS's can't handle prototypes in k... Neulinger, Nathan
- Re: [OpenAFS-devel] which OS's can't handle protot... Garance A Drosihn
- Re: [OpenAFS-devel] which OS's can't handle protot... Jim Rees
- RE: [OpenAFS-devel] which OS's can't handle protot... Neulinger, Nathan
- RE: [OpenAFS-devel] which OS's can't handle protot... Neulinger, Nathan
- Re: [OpenAFS-devel] which OS's can't handle pr... Bill Sommerfeld
- Re: [OpenAFS-devel] which OS's can't handle pr... Derek Atkins
- RE: [OpenAFS-devel] which OS's can't handle pr... Garance A Drosihn
- Re: [OpenAFS-devel] which OS's can't handle pr... Johan Danielsson
- Re: [OpenAFS-devel] which OS's can't handle protot... Marcus Watts
- Re: [OpenAFS-devel] which OS's can't handle pr... Derrick J Brashear
