Re: [OpenAFS-devel] Soft mounts for /afs root

[Derek Atkins]

David Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> RO/RW mappings should be explicit, not based on names of mount points.  
> Standards between sites vary too much.

Oh?  How many sites _don't_ use the convention of:
        /afs/<cell>     <- RO mountpoint
        /afs/.<cell>    <- RW mountpoint

Are there other programatical conventions?  If you don't use the
above convention at your site, what do you do?

Keep in mind that with AFSDB support we need a programatical way to
reach both the RO and RW copy of root.cell.  Note that this is a
client matter, not a system matter.  I have no objection to
programming a set of different client-side conventions and allowing
the client administrator to choose which convention to use.

Note: there are two threads here that are related but separate:
        a) /afs automount access to RO and RW root.cell volumes
        b) alias shortcuts to both the RO and RW volume mountpoints

-derek

-- 
       Derek Atkins, SB '93 MIT EE, SM '95 MIT Media Laboratory
       Member, MIT Student Information Processing Board  (SIPB)
       URL: http://web.mit.edu/warlord/    PP-ASEL-IA     N1NWH
       [EMAIL PROTECTED]                        PGP key available
_______________________________________________
OpenAFS-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel