> Now, we could go back to what I did back in Linux-AFS:
>
> struct vnode_t {
> struct inode v_in;
> <rest of stuff>
> };
>
> -derek
Is there any significant negative to that? Seems like it would either
require some code changes for the field names (v_in.x) instead of (x), or
alternatively, just casting the (struct vnode_t *) to a (struct inode *)
prior to using it to access elements of v_in.
Seems to me that would simplify things considerably.
-- Nathan
_______________________________________________
OpenAFS-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel
