Re: [OpenAFS-devel] strings redux

[eichin-oa]

Using memmove when you mean it is certainly clearer to other readers
of the code, as well as more correct; on systems without it (and the
only even *vaguely* relevant example of one that comes to mind is
SunOS 4.0.x!  which had an unsafe memcpy but no memmove) you can get
away with defining memmove in terms of bcopy.  (mmm, feature tests...)
_______________________________________________
OpenAFS-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel