On Wed, 29 Aug 2001, Neulinger, Nathan wrote:
> > What Derrick meant was, are there any people who depend on getting
> > ${SYS_NAME}/dest as a side-effect of running 'make', and
> > wouldn't be able
> > to deal with having to do something likke 'make dest' instead?
>
> I can't imagine anyone being impacted by that... However, doing the above
> will involve significant makefile changes since alot of the structure of the
> build currently depends on their being a dest tree. Although it might work
> out to be simple to do, I haven't taken a close look.
My only concern is to avoid being locked out of making these changes.
-D
_______________________________________________
OpenAFS-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel
- Re: [OpenAFS-devel] Call for consensus: configure ... Jeffrey Hutzelman
- Re: [OpenAFS-devel] Call for consensus: configure defau... Sam Hartman
- Re: [OpenAFS-devel] Call for consensus: configure ... Derrick J Brashear
- Re: [OpenAFS-devel] Call for consensus: configure defau... Jim Rees
- Re: [OpenAFS-devel] Call for consensus: configure defau... Derrick J Brashear
- Re: [OpenAFS-devel] Call for consensus: configure defau... Derek Atkins
- Re: [OpenAFS-devel] Call for consensus: configure ... Derrick J Brashear
- RE: [OpenAFS-devel] Call for consensus: configure defau... Neulinger, Nathan
- RE: [OpenAFS-devel] Call for consensus: configure defau... Neulinger, Nathan
- Re: [OpenAFS-devel] Call for consensus: configure ... Derrick J Brashear
- Re: [OpenAFS-devel] Call for consensus: configure defau... eichin-oa
- Re: [OpenAFS-devel] Call for consensus: configure ... Derrick J Brashear
